Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's almost the same power as mine made on Jez's dyno with 98ron so it must be there or thereabouts. Comparing it to a different dyno in a different state might be bit hit and miss.

i think he is referring to mine on e85 that was a good 40kw higher... so more a blanket statement about fuels and the turbo's capability

that HTA result is nothing short of amazing!

makes me wish i still had my car so I could do a run on the same or similar boost and see the difference.

but I chickened out on 20psi :/

I'm sure Lithium would agree that the GT3073HTA would also be interesting to see wound up on an RB25 . I don't know if FP would ever consider doing a GT3071HTA but that could also have potential . I don't suppose anyone knows which compressor housings they use with the 71 and 73mm HTA wheels ? I think they use T04S 0.70 AR ones on GT3076HTA turbos .

Thinking about it they have a 68mmHTA compressor and I wonder if it could beat the GTX3067R for a razor sharp 300 WKW capable turbo .

A .

FP do a HTA3071 (51lb/min) as well as the HTA3073 you are aware of, there are a few HTA2868s lurking around too. I most definitely do not overlook the HTA3073 at all, I had actually toiled over recommending that unit to 34GeeTeeTee when we first got to discussing upgrades for him which would give him improved response and no loss of power, but it became clear that he'd get a kick out of the extra headroom to go up to the 380-390rwkw (yep - we specifically discussed that power area prior to the tune).

The HTA3071 has a 51.2mm inducer, 71mm exducer so is a smaller compressor wheel than the GT3071R - again like the HTA3076 vs the GT3076R, so you would be looking at something that would make power somewhere between the GT3071R and GT3076R but be stupidly responsive.

After talking to 34GeeTeeTee about his driving impressions the dyno plot doesn't do it any justice (which to be fair I always knew would be the case, but still).... it sounds nuts, I am sure he will make a post at some point on the matter. If what he has said to me so far is anything to go by, then the HTA3071 would be porn for the likes of DiscoPotato and yourself.

I was just looking at an American board and I think they quoted the 71HTA wheel as having same inducer and exducer sizes as the GTX71mm compressor only 7 blades rather than 11 . I think they also quoted these wheels as both having 51 pounds air flow capacity .

A .

They are wrong, the GTX is 54.1mm inducer which is almost the same as the HTA3076 (54.8). The HTA3076 would probably make the GTX3071R feel lazy, the HTA3071 would be something else methinks.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Hey guys,

just bought an r33 gts-25t.

makes 330rwkw @ 20psi and was tuned by Unigroup with a Power Fc

Has an unopened rb25det with:

Garrett Gt3582r 0.82

Generic Stainless Highmount

Turbosmart 45mm Gate

3.5" Kakimoto Mega N1 Exhaust w/ no cat

Siemens 750cc injectors & custom fuel rail

Turbosmart FPR

Warlbo 255 internal and Bosch 044 External Fuel pump + Surge Tank

Power FC

Freddy Plenum

Ace Intercooler

Planning to downsize to a Gt3076r 0.82, swap to a low mount steampipe manifold, fit a quieter exhaust + high flow cat.

Hoping to stay around the 280-300rwkw mark.

just food for thought... if it's a street car you would get away with a stock manifold quite easily with that turbo. only time you will see a REAL benefit is if you run e85 and are pushing 350rwkw however then you are also probably going to need slightly bigger injectors.

also look into the FP 3071 for that power

(so we can see some results :P)

Hahaha good old FP :D

Welcome to the club Bennis, when you get the car bring it around so i can have a look :yes:

Hey guys, We have started a dedicated HTA chat so for all info etc please post up in the new thread here -

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...