Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'm looking to upgrade my turbo

Currently running a t04r but want to upgrade to the equavilant in the gtx range.

Would that be the gtx4294r?

Ive heard rumors such as more response than a t04z yet almost as powerful as a t51r.

Any1 used or heard of anything about these turbos?

Very interested but scared of the size they are.

T04r can on full boost a 5k so looking to either keep or improve that.

Also looking for 500ish kw at 4 wheels atleast as was makin 460kw with the t04r.

My car currently has 280in an 272ex that I was thinking of changing to both 280s.also 2.8 litre stroker.

All other turbo sugeations are greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/391344-gtx4294r-on-a-rb28/
Share on other sites

A quick google found me this. Its a much, much bigger turbo than a t04. Most people quote them as a 900hp turbo, which is way more than what your aiming for, so in my non expert opinion, its way to big. I really don't know what is the best turbo for ~500kw though, but probably something a fair bit smaller.

Yeah your right

It sucks as need to run something t4 flanged and been hearing how t04r and z are old technology and wanted to make some more power without too much extra boost as I'm running 22psi already.and seeing as the gtx4294r has better response than t04 series turbos was considering it.How about gtx4202r? Or will the gtx3582r make the power with response I'm after?

Dude, use some common sense.

The GTX4294 is a BIGGER turbo than your T04Z and will be laggier.

What are you after? More response? Or 500rwkw? You cant have both.

GTX35R will be more responsive than you T04Z (350-400rwkw)

GTX4294 will make 500rwkw (5500rpm>)

OR

Run 30psi through the T04Z.

A lot of 2jz are now running gtx4294r or it's smaller brother gtx4202r and claiming to have same and better response than a t04z and can achieve t51r like kw and they have tried t04z before hand.i wouldnt mind more power but than again same power with more response would also be good.im really looking at the gtx4202r now,just read that a 2jz starts seeing bOost at 2500rpm and on song by 3800 rpm.im also running pump but I don't know if I an be bothered changing my fuel system to suit e85 and order it by the drum.i do t trust servos either

Try again mate. The GT4202 is a 1000hp turbo, BIGGER than a GT4294 (850hp)

The GT4202 is also the same size as a T51 so its no brainer that they would be making similar power.

A 42 size turbo at target boost by 3800rpm??

Show me these results and ill buy 10 of them.

And if are serious about more response and more power the turbos I would pick:

TS GT4088

TS FP3794

I'll try find the thread again in the supra forums,also im talking all wheel power not rear.the 4088 looks really good.i might still run the gtx4294r but I'll do a little more research.i don't mind lag too much as my t04r for some reason comes on at 5grand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...