Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got a set of HKS 2510's for my RB30DETT, only thing is that with the stock turbo's its making 280+ rwkw, and from what i can see these turbo's wont make anymore power then this...

anyone used them before? is it worth installing them? I don't get why HKS would make a set of turbo's that are not any better then the stock r32 twins?

anyone have any ideas or suggestions?

how much power should these 2510's make ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/391875-rb2630-with-hks-2510/
Share on other sites

Given 2530s are bigger than -5s (400rwkw+)

And 2510s we the baby/response upgrade, probably similar to either -7 or -9 - so 300-330rwkw perhaps?

Perhaps look @ the Cartride tag, might tell you more of the story.

Or work it out from the comp wheel and compare to a -7/-9

seeing that it has the steel rear wheels, and a extra 50kw at the top end... should not be soo bad of an upgrade...

i really do enjoy the stock r32 turbo's to be honest but i do not know how long they will last on 14psi with a rb30 spinning them up

I'd probably guess not too long, and if they do let go - motor could go with it :(

If you've got em off - measure the wheels. Will give you the easiest way to work out where they "sit" in relation to other more well known offerings

No Idea on power. I bought the turbos with the engine but did some research before handing the cash over. A few UK GTR owners were getting 400 - 420rwhp on them.

Not a very widely used turbo from what i can see

A close friend has a 2510 equipped GTR, I consider his car to be fairly well optimized in terms of supporting mods.

The 2510s feel to have an excellent top end and are fairly linear down low but have a fairly sharp shift onto power. Sort of like a big single.. they have the low end pull of a 300kw turbo, and they make just over 300kw.. but they have the lag of a 350-400kw turbo lol

This is just my feeling, and I flat out keep telling the guy to swap for a single but yeah... Hes spent enough money. If I was you I would sell them and buy a good quality singe manifold :) then bang on a 300kw capable single and reap.

Guilt & I were looking @ specs quickly earlier and they are sorta in the middle of a -7 and -9

Bigger comp, but a tighter trim so they *should* be somewhere between a -7 and -9 so 320-330rwkw and about as responsive as it gets. Shouldn't feel "laggy" like a -5 set would.

looking in the engine bay today... looks like it will be quite a mission to put a big single in the Z engine bay, the twins are just about touching atm.

might have to stick with twins on this car... besides 330kw at the wheels is good for a daily streeter with a stock rb30e bottom end.

Check out the specs of the exhaust wheel and consider that too much flow from the front side for the rear more or less would stall them. I think thats their problem, they choke on spool and take a little longer than expected to wind up.

Probably worse on a 3L too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...