Jump to content
SAU Community

Official Cruise: 24.04.04 Macedon (PICTURES)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 276
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

guys thanks for the heads up on the blues smoke.... apparently this was coming from under the car as the blue Redline gearbox fluid was leaking onto the hot pipe and underbody.... as Clarkey suspected.

well let's hope that is all:D

tru that :D ah well the money I save on fuel is slowly going into building my RB25DET for a transplant.... soon my pretty... soon.... muhahaha

Farken gotta pay $200 for the R32 and R33 japanese service manuals grr... sucks major ass, but I need it desperately if I'm to transplant engines n stuff myself. The english service manuals suck, esp that 250 dollar garbage that dosen't cover the new transmission on post 1991 GTS's.

I still can't help but smile when I recall the story you were telling me outside the bakery, about the cop pulling you over and looking for the turbo. I look forward to the day you've got the new beast... if I could help with a workshop manual I would, but I've only got an R32 GTR workshop manual. Why not transplant an RB26DETT then you can use my manual :aroused:

Once again, thanks to everyone involved in the running and driving the cruise.

James, if you'd like a passenger on a scouting run, I'd be more than happy to fill the seat :D

lack of $$$ to buy an RB26. also lack of spare parts, I've gotta upgrade too many things with an RB26, with an RB25 its pretty easy (plus I've already bought a turbo and manifold for it hehe)

Okay, so I filled up today for the first time since the cruise...

423km total. 62.44L added to tank - 14.76l/100km.  :thankyou:

Filled up last night [ultimate]:

460km total, 55 L added - 11.95l/100km ~ probably my worst figure ever :P

A normal cruise up the country I would have got 550kms out of that much fuel, my best was around 9.5l/100km but thats fairly rare [& relaxed driving]!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...