Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Im soon to be getting my R33 GTST from japan through Prestige motorsport. I have a few questions in which I need to ask about, to get the car complied in Australia.

**The car comes with a 3.5 inch exhaust. Not too specified, but im highly thinking this is turbo back, and definately not standard. Do I need to place the whole standard turbo back exhaust on before I go for compliance or would a standard muffler do the job to get complied?

**I was thinking to use a second hand airbox from a mate of mine who owns a r33 gtst. Would that pass up still or do i need to buy a brand new box?

**For tires & wheels, I understand they have to be factory wheels. Can I used second hand tires and wheels to get complied?

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39510-a-few-questions-about-compliance/
Share on other sites

Geoff should be able to answer you :P which workshop are you dealing with in Sydney?

The exhaust must be standard, same goes for the airbox (used box from another car is ok but note - they might chuck your mate's airfilter out so take that out) and for the wheels and tires, you must buy new tires and present the receipt. 225/45/16 are like $110 each from Big O in Moorebank (or $105 from Tyre King in Lansvale..) for shitty DOT marked tyres. Be warned, the other workshops take the RAWS rules by the book and I've heard they will destroy the aftermarket exhaust if it needs be and bug you to get the stock one.

EDIT: deleting the workshop name :)

Hey guys,

Im actually getting it taken to SSPI (South sydeny performance imports... i think?) located @ flora st, in Kirrawee.

As for the wheels, its not a problem, as the one I bought through Geoff comes with a set of standards in which I can just place rubbers on when it arrives in Aus.

So have any of you guys heard feedback from this company in Kirrawee?

I wont take the car there with the wheels it comes with, not risking the Volk challenges getting destroyed.. :P

Cheers

Do the compliance people really look heavily into spring height?? The car im getting from Jap is lowered, but its not TOOO low. I was reading somewhere that spring height has to be stock, or within a certain range. Are compliance companies usually abit more flexible when it comes to springs?

Hey Mr_G, can I suggest you think a little further about what you are posting on a public forum? For that workshop to gain accreditation under the enw system they have had to spend a fortune....and what you are saying they will do is in direct contradiction to what they are allowed to do.

I would suggest having this whole thread deleted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...