Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150615513601394

Police appeal after performance sedan stolen - Kellyville

by NSW Police Force on Monday, 26 March 2012 at 13:00 ·

Police are appealing for information after two men were tied up and a performance sedan stolen from a Kellyville home this morning (Tuesday 27 March 2012).

About 3.50am, residents in a house on Golden Grove Avenue were awoken by intruders entering a bedroom.

The trio, who kept their faces covered, during the break in demanded the keys to the occupants’ car.

Two men inside home, aged 30 and 32, were tied up during the robbery and later able to free themselves and raise the alarm.

A 2010 Mitsubishi Evo sedan was stolen from the property. The car was seen leaving Golden Grove Avenue and then onto Acres Road.

Anyone with information on the identity of the men or their whereabouts should contact Castle Hill Police or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396041-what-is-this-world-coming-to/
Share on other sites

Yes I heard about it this morning.

To go for that at the risk of injuring themselves or the owners is brazen lunacy

...but then if there was a buyer for its parts, I wonder if the money exchanged goes straight into drugs.

Being hooked on drugs makes the addict single-minded.

An insurance assessor will wonder if the car was F/S prior to its theft.

...just joining some paranoia dots.

What does that prove? If anything it provides an even better excuse for the guys car getting stolen as people come and look at your usually at your house.

;)

Whilst obviously I don't condone insurance fraud, there's a much easier ways to get rid of your car rather then just staging a big coo like that.

Maybe the owner knew some people or was mixed up with stuff.

I agree its a lot of effort for a damn evo. There'd be a lol more to this story if you looked into it.

Hey skittles, what your address man?

Publicly show your address, let's see if they can add your skyline to their collection.

Maybe then you'll be less of a twat.

What good would a srs comment come to? Maybe it might restore his evo for him and solve world hunger.

Maybe the owner knew some people or was mixed up with stuff.

I agree its a lot of effort for a damn evo. There'd be a lol more to this story if you looked into it.

Hey skittles, what your address man?

Around 35km from yours if I take the M4.

+1 to the suspicions, too. Noone picks an evo at random and decides to break into the owners house, take the keys and tie them up. Sad part is, we'll never know why it happened :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...