Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have read through a lot of the suspension thread just so many pages.....

What I would like to know is it worth spending the money on coilovers when I won't be changing the height and stuff once it's set up ......Or just going for I new set of springs and shocks...

Is the price difference between the two much different,,,,,,what have others done......

I know that coilovers are about $1200 or so ,not sure on costs for springs and shocks...

Any input would be appreciated ..........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396337-suspension-which-way-to-go/
Share on other sites

its personal choice. nd a matter of finding the right set up that ur happy with. everyone prefers different set ups. and springs nd shockers are good for legality. nd to lower once like u want. coilovers are good to be able to change height when u want if ur not happy with it. nd with the right coilovers can stiffen up the ride a little. or can adjust the stiffness of the ride.

coil overs for track and aggressive driving.

or a nice suspension setup for a daily. coilovers will be extremely stiff compared to normal suspension.

unless you want it to handle better but want to give up comfort, go coilovers.

or just pm me and you can come for a ride in my stagea as im in sydney, its running coilovers and its a rs4s too.

i am running coilovers in mine. nd mine are soft, i am looking into getting new ones that are stiffer. it all depends on wat brand. tien super wagons have a really soft spring rate

yeah i guess. but even on softest settings. any coilovers will be more harsh than stockish setup. i mean, take out a coilover and put it next to a stock set and see the size difference. i went for a medium setup in mine, im only running 13kg/mm front and 9kg/mm rears. but i only have shitty 27 step adjustment shocks

yeah i guess. but even on softest settings. any coilovers will be more harsh than stockish setup. i mean, take out a coilover and put it next to a stock set and see the size difference. i went for a medium setup in mine, im only running 13kg/mm front and 9kg/mm rears. but i only have shitty 27 step adjustment shocks

I have to disagree on this one. Yes coilover suspension travel is almost always shorter than a shocks + springs setup but that doesn't automatically translate to harshness.

I spent a lot of time recently deciding which way to go and ended up getting BC Racing BR coilovers with softer-than-normal spring rates (F:6kg + R:5kg compared to normal F:8kg + R:6kg). Compared to my previous OEM shock + King Spring setup the coilovers are a lot more compliant and less harsh.

it depends entirely on the spring rate Jean. My M35 has coilovers and it isn't harsh at all. With the dampening off it's a "firm" stock feel. Still very boatish. Tighten it up a little and it will lose that feeling a lot.

^^^ What he said.

I was quoted around $800-$900 for a set of new KYBs, add some springs and you're very close to the BC BR prices. For something like Bilsteins + springs you'll be closer to the 2k mark, which should get you Tein SuperStreets or similar coilovers.

Check out these threads too:

Good luck.

So 99% of driving is day to day and I might throw in a track day every now and again , basically I can't afford coilovers right now so I was looking at other option and thought there are plenty of nice shocks out there and springs are pretty cheep too.....

I wouldn't mind stiffening it up a little but yeah not that keen on bouncing around on the great Syd roads....

Anyone have ideas on price for shocks and what brands they used......

1333013631[/url]' post='6295523']

I have to disagree on this one. Yes coilover suspension travel is almost always shorter than a shocks + springs setup but that doesn't automatically translate to harshness.

I spent a lot of time recently deciding which way to go and ended up getting BC Racing BR coilovers with softer-than-normal spring rates (F:6kg + R:5kg compared to normal F:8kg + R:6kg). Compared to my previous OEM shock + King Spring setup the coilovers are a lot more compliant and less harsh.

^^^ What he said.

I was quoted around $800-$900 for a set of new KYBs, add some springs and you're very close to the BC BR prices. For something like Bilsteins + springs you'll be closer to the 2k mark, which should get you Tein SuperStreets or similar coilovers.

Check out these threads too:

Good luck.

Well if they are going to work out about the same as the BC coilovers then I would be crazy not to go coilovers ....

yeah i guess. but even on softest settings. any coilovers will be more harsh than stockish setup. i mean, take out a coilover and put it next to a stock set and see the size difference. i went for a medium setup in mine, im only running 13kg/mm front and 9kg/mm rears. but i only have shitty 27 step adjustment shocks

size difference doesn't mean anything. the current forks on my downhill bike have huge lowers/stanchions. compared to my skinny forks i had last year my current ones ride like a dream. all about valving, damping and spring rate. if you wanted coilovers to be plusher than your stock suspension (for some reason), it's doable. maybe not off the shelf (no demand), but they could be made. in my opinion BC BR's standard setup is maybe the slightest bit stiffer than stock, but you could chuck them in and the only person that would notice is the owner. family/friends/etc wouldn't have a clue. dial them in and you'll start to get some complaints

I bought my BC BR's with spring rates 2kg/mm less than standard, to try to make the ride as close to standard (on the softest setting).

Did it work? Not really. On nice roads it's perfectly fine & compliant. On any road with patched up potholes however, it crashes & bangs over them like the suspension is broken. And that's a patched road, not one with actual potholes - don't get me started on those. They would be the only mod I've done to my car that I consider a compromise. Maybe I'm too fussy (or too old?).

But on the up side, it does handle really well, especially on smooth roads. And of course you can get the stance you want. I suppose sometimes you have to suffer for fashion pinch.gif .

I bought my BC BR's with spring rates 2kg/mm less than standard, to try to make the ride as close to standard (on the softest setting).

Did it work? Not really. On nice roads it's perfectly fine & compliant. On any road with patched up potholes however, it crashes & bangs over them like the suspension is broken. And that's a patched road, not one with actual potholes - don't get me started on those. They would be the only mod I've done to my car that I consider a compromise. Maybe I'm too fussy (or too old?).

But on the up side, it does handle really well, especially on smooth roads. And of course you can get the stance you want. I suppose sometimes you have to suffer for fashion pinch.gif .

Interesting, sounds like I was trying to do the same with more success... Different cars though, mine's an R34 sedan...

Just out of curiosity, have you played around with the stiffness setting much? I remember reading somewhere that extreme settings may not work that well on BC's (i.e. full soft/hard) and you mention 'softest setting' above.

I've set mine to 1/3 (8 clicks) from full soft both F&R and it's much better on all surfaces than the previous stock shocks + King Springs. And yeah this is with custom spring rates 6kg front (-2kg from standard) and 5kg rear (-1kg from standard) + bigger swaybars.

I bought my BC BR's with spring rates 2kg/mm less than standard, to try to make the ride as close to standard (on the softest setting).

Did it work? Not really. On nice roads it's perfectly fine & compliant. On any road with patched up potholes however, it crashes & bangs over them like the suspension is broken. And that's a patched road, not one with actual potholes - don't get me started on those. They would be the only mod I've done to my car that I consider a compromise. Maybe I'm too fussy (or too old?).

But on the up side, it does handle really well, especially on smooth roads. And of course you can get the stance you want. I suppose sometimes you have to suffer for fashion pinch.gif .

Maybe :P

I'm running Silkroads - 16kg front and 10kg rear. I friggin miss them (swapped in stock suspension to clear defect). I love the go kart feel...only issue is they're too low.

New custom springs on the way from Japan...that'd fix it!

Im running HKS hypermax2 coilovers with 7f 5r (i have other rates on shelf), plus whiteline os adj swaybars, feels great in the twisties and not too harsh on crap roads either! Much better all round than the stock shocks & lowered king springs i had before! But its personal preference, it depends on what you want to do/ acheive with your car and the $ your willing to spend! Im happy with my setup! Just remember, you get what you pay for!

I bought my BC BR's with spring rates 2kg/mm less than standard, to try to make the ride as close to standard (on the softest setting).

Did it work? Not really. On nice roads it's perfectly fine & compliant. On any road with patched up potholes however, it crashes & bangs over them like the suspension is broken. And that's a patched road, not one with actual potholes - don't get me started on those. They would be the only mod I've done to my car that I consider a compromise. Maybe I'm too fussy (or too old?).

But on the up side, it does handle really well, especially on smooth roads. And of course you can get the stance you want. I suppose sometimes you have to suffer for fashion pinch.gif .

This is quite interesting Leon, as I've often wondered whether BC actually altered any of the valving to accommodate the lighter springs.

I tend to think they possibly don't; this would leave you in a position where you don't have enough compression damping; and too much rebound damping.

I wonder if some of what you're feeling on rough roads is the lighter spring collapsing through some of it's compression travel, then also due to the lighter spring it doesn't rebound quickly enough to react to the next compression, gradually "packing down" the damper on bumpier roads.

Most of my suspension tuning comes from Sportsbikes; so my not be applicable, but it might be worth adding some preload to the front springs; this effectively increases the spring rate on rebound, and may give you a better chance of extending the shock in time for the next compression event.

I run the same BC BR's in the same car, with their standard spring rates; and my car is quite plush and well isolated on broken surfaces. It's very quiet, with no crashing at all; it's probably quieter than it was with the OEM gear. Also has all the benefits of the much better control, with no real down side.

This is quite interesting Leon, as I've often wondered whether BC actually altered any of the valving to accommodate the lighter springs.

I tend to think they possibly don't; this would leave you in a position where you don't have enough compression damping; and too much rebound damping.

I looked into this before I got mine and was lead to believe they only revalve if you go more than 2kg up or down.

However mine came direct from Taiwan (Jan 2012 build that I received in January) so I suppose there's a chance they would've matched the valving to suit the lower rates...?

I also disagree with the whole coilover thing making a harsh ride, in the end your benifits are usually a reduction in weight and tunability, harshness comes from incorrect spring rates and hard dappening settings.

While I'm here, can someone tell me what the stock F/R spring rates are on the M35 250t ?

Also what the standard rates are on the BC c/o for the same model?

We just installed Bilstein shockers into my RS4S we used my original springs I think it cost us $200 a corner and they can be re sleeved which is an added bonus they have a shorter throw than the stocky suspension I'm really happy with them,but the shockers r fatter than stocky and now i have a drama with my Gtr wheels just touching the shockers they r 9's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...