Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, thought this would be the best forum to ask to get decent answers. am slowly piecing a E85 fuel system together in my 180sx. so far have the following:

2.5L surge tank mounted under car, fed by a walbro 255lph intank fuel pump. have mounted 2 044 fuel pumps underneath the car aswell.

have a twin entry fuel rail with a centre return which feeds a sard type L fuel reg ... i would have gone something better, fuel lab, aeromotive etc but this part was left over from another build.

will have each 044 running a -6 line into either end of the rail and then the central return via a -6 also. injectors are bosch id2000's

questions are regarding fuel filters. which should i use? i've seen the new earls billet ones look quite good and apparently flow quite alot 175gph, which is heaps for a 044. should i run a filter for each pump in

between the surgetank and pump to stop any crap going through the 044's.. and if i run a filter between the surge and the pump, should i run another pair of filters after the 044's, in between the pump and the fuel rail?

i'd prefer just to run the one set of fuel filters, to minimise cost, and to keep as much crap out of the engine bay as possible.

reccomendations please :).. and also if someone can reccomend what sort of relay/fusing/ gauge wiring to use for the pumps :). i read the 044 draws around 15 amps, so should i use a 20amp fuse inline for each of the pumps, along with a 20amp relay?

and have the relay triggered off the factory fuel pump wiring... ecu is a link g4 plug in, so all factory fuel pump wiring etc is still in use.

thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397285-e85-fuel-system-setup/
Share on other sites

well at the moment aiming for around 250kw on the stock engine, it makes 220kw on pump now. i've got a built engine for it but not going to put that in untill there is rods hanging out the side of the stock one haha. i only really like to do things once. id1000's and one 044 would probably do it for now, but then i'd have to go and get new injectors, another pump bla bla bla later on. tuner told me that id1000's will be on the limit at around 260ish kw on e85 so hoping that id2000's and 2 044's should see me through to bout 400kw @ wheels?

Edited by sic200

That is basically the same fuel system as mine except I have a Nismo lift pump.

I use one MagnaFuel inline filter between the 044s and my fuel rail.

This system supports 800hp quite easily on E85 ;) so id say its a bit overkill for your power goals.

ID1000's maxed at 250kw!? How rich is he going to be running it??? ID2000's and 2 044's should do an easy 400rwkw.

from what i understand, for the stock engine. runs f**k all timing to keep it alive, less timing = more heat = more fuel required to keep it cool/same afr's as running normalish timing thus requiring more injector. that's how i understand it anyway.

i'm sure you can all tell me that its the wrong way to do it bla bla etc. but i trust these guys with my tune, and have been using the same 2 guys for years, which both implement the same technique. really just want to know the answer to the fuel filters if anyone has any experience in this

Edited by sic200

That is basically the same fuel system as mine except I have a Nismo lift pump.

I use one MagnaFuel inline filter between the 044s and my fuel rail.

This system supports 800hp quite easily on E85 ;) so id say its a bit overkill for your power goals.

cheers, i'll check out the magnafuel filters now :). i'll never make 800hp haha. but i'm all about overkill, id rather have too much then not enough.

If it's an EVO - 260awkw is NOT the same as a 260rwkw as EVOs are full time AWD.

1000cc are needed to support 270-300awkw in a EVO. Your tuner is correct, don't listen to the other guys saying otherwise.

Also 400awkw through an EVO will be... Interesting. Are you really going to go that far?

Hardcore overkill lol. My S15 trackie is pushing 285rwkw on 1000cc injectors, E85 fed through a single 044 :/

There's a difference between trusting someone with your car and wasting money.

Hardcore overkill lol. My S15 trackie is pushing 285rwkw on 1000cc injectors, E85 fed through a single 044 :/

There's a difference between trusting someone with your car and wasting money.

mad, what duty cycle are you on at 285 with the 1000's?

dont' really see the point in going the 1000's when they are same price as 2000's. dont care if it uses more fuel or driveability etc isn't as good, its a track only car.

I didn't read the first post at all :D

Just skipped to the power numbers in latter posts haha.

was gonna say. i even said in a post that i understand evo = 4wd and 180sx = 2wd. but didn't see a 100kw in the drivetrain loss between the two? am i serious about 400kw? in which? evo, yes. 180... it'll get there eventually.

If it's an EVO - 260awkw is NOT the same as a 260rwkw as EVOs are full time AWD.

1000cc are needed to support 270-300awkw in a EVO. Your tuner is correct, don't listen to the other guys saying otherwise.

Also 400awkw through an EVO will be... Interesting. Are you really going to go that far?

He's planning a 180sx.

was gonna say. i even said in a post that i understand evo = 4wd and 180sx = 2wd. but didn't see a 100kw in the drivetrain loss between the two? am i serious about 400kw? in which? evo, yes. 180... it'll get there eventually.

+400kw in the evo really isn't that exciting. id prefer the 400kw be in a skyline. evo = boring to drive. 4wd system in the skylines is way more fun, and alot more predictable.

800cc on e85 with a single walbro was maxed on a customers sr20 at 300kw.

U should go the id 2000cc for later upgrades.

wow, thats really good. guys up here are maxing out 800cc on pump at around 280-290kw on sr's

+ is it really going to be better for the tune using 1000cc now then changing to 2000cc later? i just see it as wasting money. as you'll need to retune the entire map for the 2000cc, and buy new injectors again. unless there is some benefit :S?

Edited by sic200

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...