Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

mad, what duty cycle are you on at 285 with the 1000's?

dont' really see the point in going the 1000's when they are same price as 2000's. dont care if it uses more fuel or driveability etc isn't as good, its a track only car.

No idea but it's very safe. If you have plans for more power down the track then go nuts on the fuel system, I'm just saying it's way overkill for what your current target is. Keep in mind there's only so much you'll be able to put to the ground in your track car, it's all well and good to want infinite amounts of power down the track, but you'll probably be faster with less once you get to the limits of your chassis and suspension setup :)

Always ensure you have a filter post pump if your using any internally submerged type pump like the walbro/044 etc etc.

E85 is a corrosive fuel and the armature, brushes & commentator inside the 044 is very likely to corrode and flake away when the car sits around with fuel in it.

sealed pump gear pumps like the top shelf weldons etc are immune to the problem. Using tool steel gears and sealed motors to keep them dry from fuel.

044's will do fine obviously loads of people use them but do keep in mid what can corode.

Same an be said for alloy surge tanks.

Make sure it's a 5356 grade alloy or higher. Anything lower will produce scale inside the tank over time and obviously harm your pumps.

No idea but it's very safe. If you have plans for more power down the track then go nuts on the fuel system, I'm just saying it's way overkill for what your current target is. Keep in mind there's only so much you'll be able to put to the ground in your track car, it's all well and good to want infinite amounts of power down the track, but you'll probably be faster with less once you get to the limits of your chassis and suspension setup :)

allready has some of the best suspension gear in her already, tyres, aero etc. i see some of the time attack cars are making upwards of 400kw and dont really have a problem with traction. its gotta be able to spin 255 z221's :), got weeks of traction yet hehe

risking... sounds like i'll be running a filter before and after the pumps. thanks for your advice :)

Anodizing won't help with a corosive fuel. You need to use an alloy that's got a high resistance to Corrosion.

5356 is typically refered to as a "marine grade" alloy and commony used.

Most of the decent alloy fuel tube I've seen is of good grade usually 6000 series and will be suitable.

I've had heaps of sales Guys come in trying to sell us Chinese surge tanks and what not.

We always ask them " oh is it corrosive resistant 4043 grade alloy your using" everytime they reply yeah of course it's 4043 and corrosive resistant blah blah. They have no idea.

Another thing to remember is alot of Chinese stuff and even some locally sold gear is 5356 material but the filler rod used to weld it is 4043. Nothing wrong with that and 4043 welds extremely well and is easy to control but the

welds will corrode over time.

My advise particularly for track cars which will sit around most days is to be cautious about the materials your fuel equipment is made from even more so if you can't actually talk to the manufacturer.

stainless grades vary like alloy ones do.

90% of my work concerns weight so we rarely use stainless when alloy is readily available to me.

honesty it's only ever 304 & 316 for exhaust systems etc that I use it for

I wouldn't want to comment on stainless grades for corrosive fuels as I really don't know.

This is relating to methanol may be of intrest to those who are better at chemisrty than me.

http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=NACE-04240

to me it seems that the less water content the less corrosion to SS304 and SS316 but like I said it's a little over my head

edit - here is another little link, says stainless is the only material not to be attacked by methanol

http://www.whitfieldoil.com/www/docs/171.263/vp-racing-fuel-

whether that applies to Ethanol I'm not sure

and a bit more science

Ethanol carries up to 0.003% vol.

acetic acid (CH3COOH + H2O). Organic

acids are corrosive in the presence

of moisture, but, in the pure state, do not

attack steel. However, plastic and rubber

are vulnerable.1 The acid-forming molecules

react with water molecules to create

hydrogen ions, which attach to the

available electrons on the oxygen atom

of water.

source

http://www.gie.com/about_us/images_for_the_news/Ramesh%20Singh%20-%20NACE%20MP%20-%20May%202009%20-Ethanol%20Corrosion%20-1.pdf

Anodizing won't help with a corosive fuel. You need to use an alloy that's got a high resistance to Corrosion.

5356 is typically refered to as a "marine grade" alloy and commony used.

Most of the decent alloy fuel tube I've seen is of good grade usually 6000 series and will be suitable.

I've had heaps of sales Guys come in trying to sell us Chinese surge tanks and what not.

We always ask them " oh is it corrosive resistant 4043 grade alloy your using" everytime they reply yeah of course it's 4043 and corrosive resistant blah blah. They have no idea.

Another thing to remember is alot of Chinese stuff and even some locally sold gear is 5356 material but the filler rod used to weld it is 4043. Nothing wrong with that and 4043 welds extremely well and is easy to control but the

welds will corrode over time.

My advise particularly for track cars which will sit around most days is to be cautious about the materials your fuel equipment is made from even more so if you can't actually talk to the manufacturer.

Excellent info, thanks Brad, I really wasn't aware of all that. I'll have to do some digging up on this for my surge tank being made. Thanks.

Anodizing won't help with a corosive fuel. You need to use an alloy that's got a high resistance to Corrosion.

5356 is typically refered to as a "marine grade" alloy and commony used.

Most of the decent alloy fuel tube I've seen is of good grade usually 6000 series and will be suitable.

I've had heaps of sales Guys come in trying to sell us Chinese surge tanks and what not.

We always ask them " oh is it corrosive resistant 4043 grade alloy your using" everytime they reply yeah of course it's 4043 and corrosive resistant blah blah. They have no idea.

Another thing to remember is alot of Chinese stuff and even some locally sold gear is 5356 material but the filler rod used to weld it is 4043. Nothing wrong with that and 4043 welds extremely well and is easy to control but the

welds will corrode over time.

My advise particularly for track cars which will sit around most days is to be cautious about the materials your fuel equipment is made from even more so if you can't actually talk to the manufacturer.

Interesting information you wouldnt happen to know what grade aftermarket industries surge tanks are? Also when you say track cars sitting around for most of the time, what time frame are you talking about without starting the car for it to be in the zone of potentially becoming an issue for the pump and surge tank. I usually start my track car once a week and let it run for 20min or so to circulate the fuel and oil.

Excellent info, thanks Brad, I really wasn't aware of all that. I'll have to do some digging up on this for my surge tank being made. Thanks.

Definitely ensure your getting it made from suitable materials.

I always make my customers aware of the materials we are using.

I've had some teams ask to actually see the filler rods I weld with to ensure it is what it is.

I don't think it's unreasonable either.

Interesting information you wouldnt happen to know what grade aftermarket industries surge tanks are? Also when you say track cars sitting around for most of the time, what time frame are you talking about without starting the car for it to be in the zone of potentially becoming an issue for the pump and surge tank. I usually start my track car once a week and let it run for 20min or so to circulate the fuel and

oil.

I honestly have no idea what Ai have fabricated them from.

I've done some testing with earls recently using the V8 sucrogen fuel.

We left sucrogen sitting in a few different tanks from a couple of different grades.

Some were full and pressurized some half empty etc.

They were all cut open after a month and corrosion was present in some of them.

It wasn't to the point of being scale but it was clearly corroded.

I'm now fabricating a range of surge tanks exclusively for earls Australia that are all ethanol/methanol safe.

We know they are good to go but you'd have to check with your particular brand to see what they say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...