Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure if this is the right section, but does anyone know which is the better insurer

I got quotes off NRMA (whose "market value" was half of what rebook is and more than half of what I am paying) so they are out

Just Car valuing it at purchase price and will cost $1,894 and covers mods

Lumleys insurance at purchase price as well for $903 and covers mods

Just wondering if there is something Im missing for Lumleys. I guess it seems too good to be true so I want to make sure there isn't a reason to avoid Lumleys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/
Share on other sites

I think Lumleys excess was 600 and just car was 800. but i dont really look at excess much, Im more interested in things they cover and dont cover, but I asked a few questions of the chick at Lumleys and everything seemed covered

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332471
Share on other sites

Lumleys SV and Shannon's give you a choice of repairer. Whereas Just Car will only give you a choice if it's the cheapest quote.

Lumleys is chasing market share at the moment, so quite a few people are making hay while the sun shines.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332475
Share on other sites

On their PDS, Lumleys SV will also cover any window breakage (eg rear quarter/side/rear) without penalty, whereas Just Car will only cover the front windscreen. Mouldings are extra tho'

PDS tells all and Shannon's is pretty good too BTW.

Just Car is often the only insurance company accessible to younger drivers. I wish there was more competition out there to reduce their premiums - sigh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332870
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

By this do you mean for example car is totalled and you have illegal coilovers they won't cover the coilovers but will the rest of the car or they outright simply won't payout anything at all. Also what is your source?

I'd like to know this as well. But from logic and a fairness point of view, I'd imagine they wouldn't cover you IF the illegal part was the cause or a contribution of the accident, which I think is somewhat fair.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6620520
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...