Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just shove the biggest muffler or mufflers under it you can, 16-18" x 11-12" x 6-8" on the back with your existing middle muffler, if its not quiet enough make the middle muffler bigger, hotdogs don't do much in the way of noise reduction and your 5" rear muffler isn't what I would call a big muffler.

my 3" exhaust was legal (90db as tested by the rta and my engineer) and my 3.5" exhaust is just the same or quieter. the loudest thing when you put your foot down is the pod filter/Turbo.

Exactly.

My 3.5" on my GTS-R is 91-92dB @ 5100rpm, so it's just over legal - but close enough for it's size and the added RPM of a 26.

Has two custom made mufflers, big as possible - job done.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To get rid of drone you would be best off tuning a Helmholtz chamber to cancel the unwanted exhaust frequency. Larger muffles will make the whole frequency range quieter but the chamber would target the frequency you want cancelled.

The maths behind reflective sound cancelling is quite complex so its best to make an adjustable length setup if you can. I doubt many muffler shops would help you with it though.

With regards to sizing, you would probably gain over 20kw going up to 3.5 inch at the moment, I gained 30kw but deleted the cat also.

My only concern with going a 3.5" exhaust system (cat back) was that it would make it louder. That being said, Im not that concerned with the power level of my car ATM anyway. The car is more traction limited more than anything and is plenty fast for the street.

just shove the biggest muffler or mufflers under it you can, 16-18" x 11-12" x 6-8" on the back with your existing middle muffler, if its not quiet enough make the middle muffler bigger, hotdogs don't do much in the way of noise reduction and your 5" rear muffler isn't what I would call a big muffler.

my 3" exhaust was legal (90db as tested by the rta and my engineer) and my 3.5" exhaust is just the same or quieter. the loudest thing when you put your foot down is the pod filter/Turbo.

I was thinking (pending packing/sizing restrictions) chucking the following on to replace the middle resonator:

http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/shopexd.asp?zone=main&id=10009

Then, Ill see how it is after that. For the sake of around $100-150 for it plus installation, Im hoping it will do the job.

Thoughts?

My only concern with going a 3.5" exhaust system (cat back) was that it would make it louder. That being said, Im not that concerned with the power level of my car ATM anyway. The car is more traction limited more than anything and is plenty fast for the street.

I was thinking (pending packing/sizing restrictions) chucking the following on to replace the middle resonator:

http://www.magnaflow...e=main&id=10009

Then, Ill see how it is after that. For the sake of around $100-150 for it plus installation, Im hoping it will do the job.

Thoughts?

you may find you run into space issues trying to fit a 22" long muffler under it, 18" is already taking it close to the axle/diff in mine.

  • 2 years later...

For any of those interested, I took some measurements under my 32 GTST for muffler sizing:

Rear Muffler (largest size possible without interference)

18X12X8

Middle Muffler

16X11X6 (CENTRE-OFFSET)

Keep in mind:

- Depth of each muffler will depend on how much ground clearance you need/want

- Main limitation with the centre muffler size is tailshaft clearance. Running a "centre-offset" muffler appears to allow largest muffler possible without creating an interference.

My AES 3" , 7" diam. rear muffler with a resonator is quiet. I havn't db'd the combo but I expect it to be legal. I did some tests recently and found that the combination of a 3" perforated tube fitted to a 7" diam. housing is about as good as it gets. If the housing is ovalised so the crosssectional area is increased resulting in more packer nothing is achieved in the quietening department. If the length is increased it will become quieter but there is a limit.

"My AES 3" , 7" diam. rear muffler with a resonator is quiet. I havn't db'd the combo but I expect it to be legal. I did some tests recently and found that the combination of a 3" perforated tube fitted to a 7" diam. housing is about as good as it gets. If the housing is ovalised so the crosssectional area is increased resulting in more packer nothing is achieved in the quietening department. If the length is increased it will become quieter but there is a limit."

If it does nothing for noise suppression, then what does increasing the cross-sectional area do?

I might sound sceptical, but I just don't see how having more material to absorb sound will not affect noise suppression...

Edited by R32Abuser

Ok. I have a testing apparatus. I will put a pic on soon. What it comprises of is a large garbage can ( plastic} with a 7" diam muffler inside it surrounded by rockwool. Inside the muffler is a 6" diam speaker. The exit pipe from the muffler also exits the top of the garbage can. I then ( via a cd) excite the speaker with an exhaust noise sample relative to the vehicle the muffler is to be fitted to. The muffler to be tested is connected to the exit pipe coming out of the garbage can. I set my db meter to record the max reading. The reading I got for a 7" diam muffler was the same for a 7" deep but 9" wide ovalised version so it appears that the packer had maxed out initially. Actually I was surprised. They were identical length. I think the same thing will happen for a 3.5" bore muffler at 8" diam.

Looks cool but I wonder how accurate it is, can never beat a proper db test on a car, a speaker just isn't going to create all the same highs and lows that you can't hear with our ears which get absorbed as well.

Edited by Rolls

This technology to test absorbtion , non baffled mufflers , has been around since the 1950's. It speeds up the development process to find the optimum ingredients to suit the application. Obviously there could be a variation in the real world but it is surprisingly accurate. It works for me.

All that happens there (assuming it's straight through) is that the pipe has two gentle bends so it goes between inlet and outlet. It's not like those other mufflers with lots of up and back triple pass bullshit. It's just a convenience thing for fitting it into a given space.

UNLESS you're talking about its muffling qualities...in which case it might be a bit different because one end of the internal pipe is much closer to one side wall than the other. But I wouldn't be worrying about it!

Does it matter if the muffler intake and exit are offset?

I purchased the following from magnaflow before checking about thatMF12589_1000.jpg

I purchased a 16" X 8" X 5" magnaflow item for $200. 3in inlet and outlet and I can guarantee you its a straight through muffler. Pretty much looks like the above ^^^

My reasoning for going this muffler was that it was the largest middle muffler (cross sectional area and length) I could find without going custom. As per my post above, you can fit a slightly bigger item under the car but I was unable to find suitable off the shelf items without going custom. Custom = $$$...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...