Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmm I was sure I'd seen people plumb catch cans back into the sump, maybe it was after an oil air seperator.

Oil is just shell helix HX7 10-40, might be too thin?

That's not going to account for air in the sump, would a blocked pcv cause that though?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes it would be the catch can plumbed back to the sump with a breather on top, maybe try 10-60 or 15-60, a blocked or broken PCV might be the cause especially on turbo cars, at least its easy to check it!

Edited by 51NNA

OK more info on this.

Replaced the leak down % gauge with a regular 0-150psi gauge.

Dialled in 20-40-60-80 and 100 psi inputs and no matter what input I put in, when connecting up to the spark plug hose BOTH gauges would always drop 5psi, as per usual the air can be felt leaving the dipstick.

This doesn't make sense to me, 5psi of 20 is a huge 25% drop but 5psi of 100 is obviously only 5%. Further to that, both gauges dropped down by the same amount, I'd have thought that the input pressure gauge should stay at the set pressure but how can that ever work if both gauges on the spark plug side of the regulator.

Of course the gauge is going to drop in pressure when connected as you've just opened up a larger volume of space for it to pressurise. Should both gauges be dropping like that?

Just buy a compression tester, rip all the plugs out first, start at 1 and work you're way back, crank it over 3 or 4 times and write down the results. Should be around 140-160 if a cyl is leaking it will show.

i bought a few of the leak down testers off ebay and they all were faulty.... 3 in fact. It turns out they were calibrated for "small engines" and the seller in china just thought removing the sticker would make it suitable for your average motor car..

bought one locally from snap on and it works perfectly.

Status I was thinking the same thing, low input pressures to set it implied it was for small engines, but I've replaced the leak down % gauge with another -150psi gauge so calibration is not an issue now.

A mechanic on another forum is telling me that on a good engine there should not be really notable air flow into the crankcase so that's enough info regardless of what the gauges say.

I'll have some more good data hopefully this evening when I can leak down test another mates rebuilt CA which makes good power so we know it's tight enough.

From there I can make a call, and it may just be turn down the boost a touch, run thicker oil and modify the catch setup to keep driving it.

As for the catch setup it's a standard exhaust cam into catch, catch into intake setup, no venting. (I have baffled it so it actually catches the oil...)

If I modify it I'll delete the PCV, pipe the intake into the catch also, plumb a drain into the catch back to the sump and vent the catch to atmo so the engine can breath back through it as needed.

I'm also considering one of these little guys to help sealing.

http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydisplay.asp?catcode=13023

OK more info.

Had my mate come over, and to correct a mistake I made earlier his SR only has fresh bearings, rings are 106ks.

We leak down tested his and then switched the second gauge on the tester and pumped 80psi into a cylinder, his came back with the same results mine had, about 20% on the leak down and notable air escaping from the dipstick/oil filler hole. Though I noticed his took a few seconds of pressuring at 80psi before the air escaping the dipstick etc was noticeable.

We warmed mine up and tested it again, same results as his. So I can only conclude that there is not enough solid data to pull it down.

On the catch can front, I've had an idea. As my can has an input into it from the exhaust side rocker and exits out into the intake like the factory setup, I'm wondering if the reason it's filling so quick is that the GT2560 on 17-18psi is generating enough vacuum in the intake pipe (where the catch can feeds back into) to draw more oil heavy vapours out of the rocker cover than it would with a factory turbo on stock boost.

I will test this by blocking that feed back into the intake and throwing it on the dyno with an empty catch.

^^ just had a thought... did you remove the big black baffle box that connects the crankcase to the rocker cover vent? if so put it back.

To be honest, I'm not sure what that is or where it would be on a CA, I don't recall seeing anything matching that description. The factory breather setup on a CA just goes from the exhaust rocker to the intake pipe in front of the turbo. Mine now has a baffled catch can between those points.

The water is probably leaking externally somewhere. CAs are notorious for headgasket water leaks.

I've had a solid look but that's not to say it isn't weeping onto the exhaust manifold and burning off or leaking down the back of the engine where it's impossible to see.

I had an oil leak at the back of the engine from the half moon seal and that's been fixed now so hopefully if it's leaking down the back I'll see it.

Any thoughts on my oil comments? turbo creating vacuum in the catch?

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok update time and good news.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

I disconnected the pipe from the catch to the intake pipe and went for a blast after emptying the catch. Came back with a clean catch this time.

So I'll get a filter for the exit of the catch can and block the intake port. Job done :D

If it is using it, then of course it wont.

I'll be watching it very closely to see if the level is dropping and requiring top up.

I'll also lay something down underneath it to make it easier to spot leaks.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

If that's the case, then maybe a there's a few kws to be had by improving the intake/filter. If the compressor sees a vacuum then it has to overcome that to get back to atmospheric pressure before it can make boost, so there'll be more heat in the compressed air and spool will be slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...