Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you compare micko's gtx3071 with the gtx3076 the power curves are almost identical, even the boost response is identical, i do admit i have cams ( not sure if they really benefit the boost response, might even slow it down) and external gate so maybe this has brought my turbo up to his level , but the difference in boost levels is just as significant, im running 5-6psi less in the whole rev range..

Seems the gtx3076 has been taking a bad wrap for a long time, and the gtx3071 is described as more responsive/better turbo and the turbo of choice, compare the two graphs and they are equal, the gtx3076 should even be in first place, and with over 350kw potential its a winner in my eye..... obviously setup dependent ( external gate, E85, proper tune, engine condition etc)

might add some in car footage soon ..

Edited by SliverS2
  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's the issue Mark, not many cars have a good enough setup to attain those sort of figures, and that's why it got a bad name. Stock manifolds or 3 inch exhausts aren't going to cut it, we are talking 4 inch system here, and how many would run that on the road.

I can say after running both the GTX3076 isn't quite as responsive as the 71 but spools in a similar fashion, with approx. 40kw higher potential imo.

I think the gtx range is very impressive going off some of the most recent results.

But I personally would probably still sway to the gt3076 If I didn't want to run more then 18-20psi and was internally stock. The gtx3076 would be epic on a built 25/30 running an external gate and pumping 25+psi.

Has there been any twin scroll setups for the gtx3076 to combat the smidge of extra lag?

Edited by Mitcho_7

I think the gtx range is very impressive going off some of the most recent results.

But I personally would probably still sway to the gt3076 If I didn't want to run more then 18-20psi and was internally stock. The gtx3076 would be epic on a built 25/30 running an external gate and pumping 25+psi.

Has there been any twin scroll setups for the gtx3076 to combat the smidge of extra lag?

Yep, its in the RB25 results! Was REALLY responsive...... Wish i went that way now!

Yep, its in the RB25 results! Was REALLY responsive...... Wish i went that way now!

The only one I can find is a regular gt3076r twin scroll that Scotty did the exhaust etc for. It's got a pretty freakin epic looking graph on 98 let alone the e85 tune!

What is the difference between the gtx3076 and the gt3040 wolverine?

I have a GT3040 sitting in the garage, I reckon it will produce the same numbers on E85 as a GTX3076 but much cheaper.

How much you after? That is the 3082 equivelent yeah?

The only one I can find is a regular gt3076r twin scroll that Scotty did the exhaust etc for. It's got a pretty freakin epic looking graph on 98 let alone the e85 tune!

What is the difference between the gtx3076 and the gt3040 wolverine?

I think the compressor is bigger? Power potential is similar though!

Yep, GT3040 is a GT3082.

The compressor is an 82mm compressor with similar flow potential of a billet 76mm compressor. Same 60mm turbine.

My GT3040 has extrude honed front and rear covers. I changed to a TS GT3076 so the old turbo is still sitting in the shed.

i dont know much about gt3082's, my turbo doesnt feel like its an on/off turbo like the gt3082sounds, mine feels very efficient and on throttle is torquey even off boost and with 5psi in third is taking off, the mightly rush happens at 4000-4500rpm and never runs out to 7000rpm, but its not like a switch, up some steep hills it will pull you in the seat even at 3000rpm...

so without experiencing a gt3082 i cant say, but i can say this turbo is showing its presence even without the 4000rpm etc revs...

i agree though if you dont want to run atleast 20psi then the gt is better...

Ts housing on the 3040 for science?

Or will it not fit?

TS housing would fit .

If I had a highmount manifold, for science, it would go on. Since there was enormous difficulty getting the manifold, oil drain etc fitted with an RB25 from a Stagea in the R33 there is no chance the current turbo is coming off unless the engine comes out.

i dont know much about gt3082's, my turbo doesnt feel like its an on/off turbo like the gt3082sounds, mine feels very efficient and on throttle is torquey even off boost and with 5psi in third is taking off, the mightly rush happens at 4000-4500rpm and never runs out to 7000rpm, but its not like a switch, up some steep hills it will pull you in the seat even at 3000rpm...

so without experiencing a gt3082 i cant say, but i can say this turbo is showing its presence even without the 4000rpm etc revs...

i agree though if you dont want to run atleast 20psi then the gt is better...

Sounds just like a GT3040 which isn't very different from a GT3076 in my experience.

  • 2 months later...

Just read the whole thread, sounds like an impressive build.

I've got a fresh forged + camed 25 waiting to go in my 32, Gtx3076 + ext gate + 20-22psi on e85 seems a good way to go in your experience?

I'm still tossing between 76 & 71..

Out of interest, a local workshop here have done a built SR20VE+T using a GTX3076R and tuned it to 30psi and made a fairly impressive 477kw @ hubs with it. When given a bit of shite about dyno setting fiddling they gave a bunch of info on how they ran it so people can scrutineer it for themselves.

Looksy here: http://www.shredmotorsport.co.nz/2012/sr20vet-results-and-the-truth-about-dyno-corrections/

622274_413213968746634_1172936981_o-1024x819.jpg

Just read the whole thread, sounds like an impressive build.

I've got a fresh forged + camed 25 waiting to go in my 32, Gtx3076 + ext gate + 20-22psi on e85 seems a good way to go in your experience?

I'm still tossing between 76 & 71..

i dont see the point in a gtx3071, the gtx3076 seems to respond just as good and makes more power from the dyno graphs ive compared and with less boost,( micko's compared to mine for example) im still thinking wether the 0.63 rear would of been the best option seeing my power goal was 300-320kw, the spooling and area under the curve may have been better and still had the top end, thats using E85..

Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Assuming the current ECU is stock, it might be worth getting hold of a nissan data scan cable. It could be as simple as voltage at the ECU
    • You need to test for spark when it matters - ie cranking. Kill the fuel supply, pull a plug and earth it, set up a camera and go crank. The spark needs to be consistent, every other turn of the engine. Not some sputtering of occasional spark. The reason I say this is because spinning the CAS in the air is not the same as spinning it installed, and if there is a bearing problem in it, the disk might work differently in the air than in the engine. You won't want to try to set the timing unless you know the spark is happening right.  Also, reconsider running the R35 coils against the stock ECU. They like a different amount of dwell cf the originals. It's not massive, you can actually run them, but it is better if you can adjust the dwell (which you can with Nistune in the stocker, or with an aftermarket ECU). Besides any of that - when you had the multimeter out, have you got power where it needs to be, earth where it needs to be (and when, in the case of igniter triggers), etc?
    • Apologies for the long post, but needed somewhere to lay out the entire timeline of events and actions taken:   I've got an 89 GTR with a R34 RB in it. It's been running great all year, driven probably 500KM in the last month. It's not my daily driver, just a weekend fun car.    Build info: R34 RB26 - HKS 2.7 stroker kit, HKS adjustable cam gears, HKS turbo upgrades, Trust intercooler, R34 factory DENSO 440cc injectors, JUN chipped/tuned R32 ECU. All of this work was performed in Japan back in 2019.    Thursday 10/2/25 - It's a nice day and decided I'll drive it to work, I start it up in the garage and I notice it took a few extra cranks and sounded a bit funny. I figure maybe it was just because it was a pretty chilly morning. I pull it out into the driveway to warm up a bit before leaving. As I leave the driveway, it feels very off and sounds like a misfire. I pull it back in the garage to deal with after work and take the daily to work. I was able to diagnose it as a cylinder 5 misfire with the old spark plug test (unplugging each plug until a sound change with the engine running). I take off the whole ignition system, ignitor, plugs, spark. *Important note, it is still on the R32 ignition system with the separate ignitor system. I test each system with a multi-meter and nothing presents as a smoking gun. I put it all back together and it starts up no issue. I go ahead and order the PRP R35 ignition conversion kit. It should arrive today (10/13/25)   Friday 10/3/25 - Another nice day, car starts up great and drives great all day. Very pleased that everything seems to be OK   Sunday 10/5/25 - Decided I'll take it to play some golf, load up and drive to the course about 25 minutes away. Drives wonderful the whole way there, I pull in the parking lot and the engine completely comes to a stop. I do not recall if it sputtered at all, but just remember all of the sudden the engine was off. I roll it into a parking spot, try to crank it back on and nothing.  It'll crank and crank and not even try to start. End up getting it towed back to my house and push it up into the garage.    Items I have checked: Fuel in the tank Fuel Pump relay Fuel pump fuse  Spark Plugs & gap Coil packs Ignitor    I know the cylinders are getting fuel as the plugs smell like fuel after a start attempt. I tried spraying starter fluid into the manifold and cranking and not even a sputter.    I decided to do the live CAS test (removing the the CAS, ignition on and spinning the CAS stalk to see if the injectors pulse and spark is active). All of the injectors were pulsing and I have spark at the plug. The half-moon end of the CAS did seem very loose, I'm not sure how much play is supposed to be there, but it was more than I expected. There was no in/out play of the shaft, just the tip end that is pinned on had quite a bit of play.    CAS Play video   When I put the CAS back in, I stupidly did not re-time the engine. I know I need to do that tonight, however, I do not think it will start given it seemingly was not the issue. My plan is to do the PRP R35 coil kit and retime the engine at the same time.    I plan on ordering the Haltech Nexus Plug-in ECU once they are available again, but ideally would like to get this sorted before firing the parts cannon at it and potentially adding more variables.    Anything glaring that I am missing here, I'm a bit at a loss?          
    • Get it on a dyno. Get something logging Consult. Run it up and find out what is causing it.
    • Looking for a plenum for rb25 de+t neo  Not looking to push much power maybe 300kw at the wheels, is there much difference in flow for Freddy “Greddy style” compared to original Greddy or options like Proflow or Otaku garage?    I won’t be porting the de Neo head for now as I think it’ll be fine 280-300rwkw but appreciate the help and any experiences anyone has between them and any advice. Thanks  Looking at this plenum for now below 
×
×
  • Create New...