Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you compare micko's gtx3071 with the gtx3076 the power curves are almost identical, even the boost response is identical, i do admit i have cams ( not sure if they really benefit the boost response, might even slow it down) and external gate so maybe this has brought my turbo up to his level , but the difference in boost levels is just as significant, im running 5-6psi less in the whole rev range..

Seems the gtx3076 has been taking a bad wrap for a long time, and the gtx3071 is described as more responsive/better turbo and the turbo of choice, compare the two graphs and they are equal, the gtx3076 should even be in first place, and with over 350kw potential its a winner in my eye..... obviously setup dependent ( external gate, E85, proper tune, engine condition etc)

might add some in car footage soon ..

Edited by SliverS2
  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's the issue Mark, not many cars have a good enough setup to attain those sort of figures, and that's why it got a bad name. Stock manifolds or 3 inch exhausts aren't going to cut it, we are talking 4 inch system here, and how many would run that on the road.

I can say after running both the GTX3076 isn't quite as responsive as the 71 but spools in a similar fashion, with approx. 40kw higher potential imo.

I think the gtx range is very impressive going off some of the most recent results.

But I personally would probably still sway to the gt3076 If I didn't want to run more then 18-20psi and was internally stock. The gtx3076 would be epic on a built 25/30 running an external gate and pumping 25+psi.

Has there been any twin scroll setups for the gtx3076 to combat the smidge of extra lag?

Edited by Mitcho_7

I think the gtx range is very impressive going off some of the most recent results.

But I personally would probably still sway to the gt3076 If I didn't want to run more then 18-20psi and was internally stock. The gtx3076 would be epic on a built 25/30 running an external gate and pumping 25+psi.

Has there been any twin scroll setups for the gtx3076 to combat the smidge of extra lag?

Yep, its in the RB25 results! Was REALLY responsive...... Wish i went that way now!

Yep, its in the RB25 results! Was REALLY responsive...... Wish i went that way now!

The only one I can find is a regular gt3076r twin scroll that Scotty did the exhaust etc for. It's got a pretty freakin epic looking graph on 98 let alone the e85 tune!

What is the difference between the gtx3076 and the gt3040 wolverine?

I have a GT3040 sitting in the garage, I reckon it will produce the same numbers on E85 as a GTX3076 but much cheaper.

How much you after? That is the 3082 equivelent yeah?

The only one I can find is a regular gt3076r twin scroll that Scotty did the exhaust etc for. It's got a pretty freakin epic looking graph on 98 let alone the e85 tune!

What is the difference between the gtx3076 and the gt3040 wolverine?

I think the compressor is bigger? Power potential is similar though!

Yep, GT3040 is a GT3082.

The compressor is an 82mm compressor with similar flow potential of a billet 76mm compressor. Same 60mm turbine.

My GT3040 has extrude honed front and rear covers. I changed to a TS GT3076 so the old turbo is still sitting in the shed.

i dont know much about gt3082's, my turbo doesnt feel like its an on/off turbo like the gt3082sounds, mine feels very efficient and on throttle is torquey even off boost and with 5psi in third is taking off, the mightly rush happens at 4000-4500rpm and never runs out to 7000rpm, but its not like a switch, up some steep hills it will pull you in the seat even at 3000rpm...

so without experiencing a gt3082 i cant say, but i can say this turbo is showing its presence even without the 4000rpm etc revs...

i agree though if you dont want to run atleast 20psi then the gt is better...

Ts housing on the 3040 for science?

Or will it not fit?

TS housing would fit .

If I had a highmount manifold, for science, it would go on. Since there was enormous difficulty getting the manifold, oil drain etc fitted with an RB25 from a Stagea in the R33 there is no chance the current turbo is coming off unless the engine comes out.

i dont know much about gt3082's, my turbo doesnt feel like its an on/off turbo like the gt3082sounds, mine feels very efficient and on throttle is torquey even off boost and with 5psi in third is taking off, the mightly rush happens at 4000-4500rpm and never runs out to 7000rpm, but its not like a switch, up some steep hills it will pull you in the seat even at 3000rpm...

so without experiencing a gt3082 i cant say, but i can say this turbo is showing its presence even without the 4000rpm etc revs...

i agree though if you dont want to run atleast 20psi then the gt is better...

Sounds just like a GT3040 which isn't very different from a GT3076 in my experience.

  • 2 months later...

Just read the whole thread, sounds like an impressive build.

I've got a fresh forged + camed 25 waiting to go in my 32, Gtx3076 + ext gate + 20-22psi on e85 seems a good way to go in your experience?

I'm still tossing between 76 & 71..

Out of interest, a local workshop here have done a built SR20VE+T using a GTX3076R and tuned it to 30psi and made a fairly impressive 477kw @ hubs with it. When given a bit of shite about dyno setting fiddling they gave a bunch of info on how they ran it so people can scrutineer it for themselves.

Looksy here: http://www.shredmotorsport.co.nz/2012/sr20vet-results-and-the-truth-about-dyno-corrections/

622274_413213968746634_1172936981_o-1024x819.jpg

Just read the whole thread, sounds like an impressive build.

I've got a fresh forged + camed 25 waiting to go in my 32, Gtx3076 + ext gate + 20-22psi on e85 seems a good way to go in your experience?

I'm still tossing between 76 & 71..

i dont see the point in a gtx3071, the gtx3076 seems to respond just as good and makes more power from the dyno graphs ive compared and with less boost,( micko's compared to mine for example) im still thinking wether the 0.63 rear would of been the best option seeing my power goal was 300-320kw, the spooling and area under the curve may have been better and still had the top end, thats using E85..

Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
×
×
  • Create New...