Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So after installing the boost controller it was time to test it out on the dyno.

sorry the pics are a bit shity but here we go.

We tryed 3 diferent settings,(stock turbo is f**ked) 7psi,9psi and 10.5psi droping off to around 9 leaving it at 170kw.

Sadly it was pig rich,stupid stock ecu, so theres an easy 10-15kwto be had if it was runing around 12.5:1

but ended up with a 14% gain overall.

IMG_0286.jpg

KW and Torque

IMG_0290.jpg

KW and boost

IMG_0288.jpg

IMG_0289.jpg

Torque and boost

IMG_0287.jpg

Since we have turned the boost up on the R34 it was time for a front mount intercooler

IMG_0294.jpg

I was pretty surprised how much bigger the GTT intercooler is compared to an R33 one

IMG_0291.jpg

IMG_0292.jpg

Delta fin 8-) tested on of these coolers on my mates rb25 s13 on the dyno against another type of intercooler and it really performed well,

much lower intake temps.

IMG_0295.jpg

IMG_0296.jpg

IMG_0298.jpg

will probly finish it on tuesday

Hmmm i started having a problem with the r32 idleing really high, and it seemed like the throttlebody's were not fully closing.

After checking everything that could be affecting the last thing to do was remove the intake manifold,and im glad i did....

Pulling the plenum away from the throttle bodys i strait away saw the peice of tissue paper caught around one of the throttlebodys,dope au

DSCF1745.jpg

So i thought f**k while this shits off i might aswell do as much as i can so i decided to get rid of evrey single water line, heater hoses and all,everythings gone, getting rid of some realy shit hoses andd a million possible leak points

DSCF1741.jpg

And i also gave the plenum a blasting while its off to

DSCF1743.jpg

As soon as i get some ball joints and swaybar bushes this will be going in the laurel

DSCF1746.jpg

DSCF1747.jpg

Thanks DJRIFT, yea its definantly a problem, my tuner had a considerable voltage drop in his 32 GTR through shitty old loom,

So he wasnt going to tune mine until i had done it haha.

:thumbsup: Cheer's Samos69, haha yea well my mate had a GTS-t the same year and the rego just said "skyline coupe" so we threw the rego and plates on

the GTR, i drove it all the way from Auckland to New plymouth :sweat: 260km runs on the motorway

Trying to build a responsive 20 :P

DSCF1801.jpg

DSCF1808.jpg

DSCF1806.jpg

DSCF1807.jpg

DSCF1799.jpg

DSCF1798.jpg

DSCF1797.jpg

Its a Garrett copy T28, watercooled, 360* thrust bearing and .64 rear, should be good for the rb20, even a shity t3t4 makes 20's pretty damn laggy, so this shud be good.

Yea its a t3-t2 adaptor and im going to have the wastegate venting from it, much easier than moding the manifold, and it means i get

to keep the heat sheild ;)

I saw a picture of a cef a little while ago with one, and that was runing a huge turbo to, so im hoping it will fit fine in the laurel (finger's crossed)

Just palnning on runing it on around 13-14psi runing a mines chiped ecu, would be happy if it made 160-170kw,injectors would be maxed tho.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...