Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently looking, been following the newspaper, forums and other means of advertisements and noticed a huge decrease in GTR Prices. I looked at a couple of R32's today. Each for sale at 25k. One being a 91 mod the other a 93mod. Both pretty standard though one with abit higher K's then the other. There are also a few GTR's in the Trading post under 30k. Prodiminently (no idea how 2 spell that word) R32 GTRs. A friend is also selling an immac r33 96 vpsec with under 80k on the clock in white with 19s deep dish for 35k.

Is it just me or has the 89 model GTR's caused such a decrease in value of the GTR??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40322-gtr-prices-getting-lower-and-lower/
Share on other sites

to pick up a good condition 89 model R32 it would cost about 20K landed. paying the extra 5k for a car thats newer but has had more thraashing isnt worth it..

so id just buy a nice 89 gtr if i was going to buy a GT-R.

R33's start price is 35K for one that isnt too special.. ive seen stock ones 1995 vspec for 42K.. what you pay is what you get.

a clean r33 will never be less then 40k on average.

to pick up a good condition 89 model R32 it would cost about 20K landed. paying the extra 5k for a car thats newer but has had more thraashing isnt worth it.
I personally wouldn't buy an R32 GTR for anything less than about $26-28k for quality reasons.
I personally wouldn't buy an R32 GTR for anything less than about $26-28k for quality reasons.

Likewise, in fact, that's what I did :(

I think Australian local prices are starting to fall in line with Japanese prices. However, I expect prices to plateu in the 20K range for quite a while.

LW.

I personally wouldn't buy an R32 GTR for anything less than about $26-28k for quality reasons.

well the R32 gtr that im importing i got checked out from a friend. its costing me 23k landed not including orcs etc, its clean and more clean then ANY and i mean ANY R32 that ive seen in australia that is 1992,3,4 etc.

its got 60,000km's that are gen and all have been logged into original Service books. totaly stock standard exhaust is even still on the car, the only thing thats been changed is the CD player and Seat to a more comfy Recaro :(

Well, GT-Rs havnt dropped a Penny.. people just drop them for financial reasons.

well its May.. lot of overseas students return from studying in australia soon.. tend to sell them off before they go back.

And a few i think are hoping to sell incase the 89 GTR prices bring the prices of R32 GTR in general down (which I don't think is going to happen much anyhow).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...