Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, and thankyou to those who gave advice on my G-FORCE thread!

Some interseting things came from that!!

Anyways....Installed the GFB BOV last nite (after boost/rev problem was sorted as per previous thread), and I'm about to take the bloody thing BACK OFF! Noise is nice..if ur into that...but power flow is lost...that is...boost comes on slower, but still there. I've checked for leaks: I suspect that the valve itself is so badly built that it has inherent leaking abilities. After my G-FORCE issue thread, I now realise that even the slightest leak in our cars induction system will cause grief...and potentially more dollars to find and fix.

Has anyone else expd this? GOOGBYE to Go Fast Bits BOV......and f**k you!

Thanx.Mark.

stock BOV leaks

I'm willing to bet that a good condition stock BOV is still better, in this case!!

Just way too many 'joints and screw in parts' on the After Market stuff.

Do you think the whole BOV thing on a relatively standard car may be a bit of a wank??? I mean, they look good 'en all.....but........

Guest RedLineGTR

i have a GFB hybrid BOV installed on my car for about a year or so now experimenting with the stock one (temp), the GFB one held boost fine didnt notice any type of leaks or anything, the boost came on harder with the GFB one as compaired to the stock BOV which does leak abit and you get boost comming on much smoother, but i like the whiplash :)

stock BOV leaks

I've seen ppl running over 1 Bar using stock BOV and it's fine. If yours leak, change the BOV spring so you can hold more boost. Might worth to check that your wastegate is not leaking before accusing the stock BOV as the culprit.

BTW, who needs choo choo sound anyway? Leave it to locomotives....

guys, depends on the individual setup on your car...

is it mounted:

1. After the intercooler and before the throttle body?

or...

2. After the turbo and before the intercooler?

reason i ask is because if there is a pressure variance between what's actually trying to "push" the BOV open and what's running down it's vacuum hose, then you're bound to get leaks. I wouldn't be quick to blame the BOV to be at fault. As quite often than not, the problem can be associated with situation number 2 (above).

In most situations, for example, there might be 15psi coming from the turbo compressor housing, but by the time the boost pressure makes its way through the intercooler and piping, this pressure may have dropped to say 12 psi due to intercooler and piping restrictions...

The pressure in the inlet manifold which travels down the vacuum line to the BOV will not being "enough" to hold the BOV shut when the throttle is open. Hence, your leaks you are reporting...

I used the proper GFB adaptor kit, (Ofcourse you want the best chance of it working),

seemed to mount on nicely to the pipe, then the sus bit, you have to install a pissy little O ring inside the BOV base that really seems slack. Between that O ring and the vac nipple i could just see POTENTIAL for leaks...I just was not confident even before turning the key!! Then that bloody 'flutter" and woosh..My little brother loves it, but if someone took my rego down, I wouldn't be surprised. If i was to PLUM it straight back into the turbo and block off the 'trumpet' part (1 of 3 options in the kit), then what's the point of having it......it still leaks..Now the ridgey didge is back on....***** ACE!!

I havnt put mine on yet but the first thing i changed with it was the adapter, and swapped it with a direct bolt-on to fit a skyline..

yep, that's wot I did ,bro........test it in second gear going hard....does your boost feel like it's coming in later and ..i don't know...just different??

GOOD LUCK!!!

I'm expecting one of these to turn up in my mailbox any day now. The first thing I am planning to do is get it welded to a proper adapter so there is absolutely no leaks.

keep an eye on that O ring and 'nipple' , maybe you should 'teflon tape'it?

I've seen ppl running over 1 Bar using stock BOV and it's fine. If yours leak' date=' change the BOV spring so you can hold more boost. Might worth to check that your wastegate is not leaking before accusing the stock BOV as the culprit.

BTW, who needs choo choo sound anyway? Leave it to locomotives....

ummm, my friend....mmmm..good comment on the choo choo, I agree.

But, ummm....did I not base the entire thread on saying that the stock BOV is good? Have a re-read my GT brother, andhavagoodweekend.

fatgts-r, i should have been more careful with my explanation. i think you understood the point i was making, but you also picked up on my mistake. good spot!

setup number 2 is the culprit. not setup number 1. all GTR skylines are setup like situation number one. have you heard an gtr owners complain about boost leaks?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...