Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You can add a couple of pounds and then the ECU will start to get all emo and after that any more boost is a waste of time, as you will get slower instead of faster.

Adding a boost controller is easy. There is a vacuum/boost line from the compressor outlet to the wastegate actuator. On a stock R33 it goes via the boost control solenoid valve. You put your boost controller into that line. But the details of how and what depend on the type of controller you are installing.

These ones

The top one is the plenum to boost guage line you can tee into that.

the blue one is probably the actuator line, you have to take a closer look.

I did a Hks evc 4, they come with instructions anyway.

post-89755-0-49704600-1343393909_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-45238100-1343393952_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-30420500-1343394159_thumb.jpg

You mean a boost tee? that goes on the blue line

they are dodgey

If your talking about something else i have no idea.

I just read the instructions and know whats what in my engine bay.

Edited by D.I.Y. Mik

looking at the photo you posted, the best place for you to put it is in that hose with the big white cable tie on it.

But i wouldnt recommend doing it unless you have some sort of aftermarket ECU. If not, leaving it stock, or putting in a 10psi R32 actuator will give you better results.

The fact that the boost solenoid is missing in your car would suggest that possibly you already have and R32 actuator. Unless some bleed valve is hidden away somewhere we cant see.

You mean a boost tee? that goes on the blue line

they are dodgey

If your talking about something else i have no idea.

I just read the instructions and know whats what in my engine bay.

Simple bleeder based boost controllers are anything but dodgy. They just don't offer as rigid control as other devices. They are actually far more trustworthy in terms of what happens when they fail (which they don't) whereas an electronic boost controller can totally destroy an engine if it fails.

But there is more than one way to skin a cat. I built my own boost controller from a collection of pneumatic devices (relief valve, pressure regulator and one way valve) and it offers solid boost control. Cheaper than an EBC, more reliable than an EBC, easier to install than an EBC, easier to set up than an EBC. Don't know why I would want an EBC.

The other thnig I can never work out, is why people want to measure the boost inside the plenum and closed loop control that with an EBC. Let's say that you are at partial throttle. You do not want full boost. Yet the EBC is measuring less than full boost, so it slams the wastegate shut and makes the turbo work like a motherf**ker to create umpteen bazzillion psi of boost between the turbo and the partially closed throttle butterfly - which is then wasted across the throttle butterfly because you have it partially closed. Worse, you have to keep the throttle even more closed than you otherwise would because of the high pressure upstream of the throttle. Worse, the car will be twitchy (go over bumps, have you ankle move a mm, have the load on the engine increase/decrease drastically as the throttle moves a tiny amount.

Whereas, if you take your boost signal from upstream of the throttle butterfly - ie, from the compressor housing, like the OEM does it, then things tend to work the way that they are supposed to.

Edited by GTSBoy

I cant say i have ever met anyone that takes a EBC boost feed of the plenum.

What exactly do you mean by an EBC failing can totally destroy an engine? My EBC is an electro magnetic solenoid, as i thought most of them were. . If it fails, its open. Therefore only wastegate boost will be reached.

Easy to install. On vac line from the intercooler piping, one from the actuator. One ground wire, and one signal wire. Hardly rocket science.

An EBC doesnt "slam shut" a wastegate anyway. They are always shut. The EBC just doesnt let it open untill the desired boost is reached. Exactly the same principle as a manual boost Tee. I dont see what the issue is .

Sounds to me like you have had an issue before so totally rubbish every other EBC on the market because of it.

  • Like 1

I cant say i have ever met anyone that takes a EBC boost feed of the plenum.

Closed loop boost control has to measure boost where you want it controlled. Boost, by most people's definition, is positive inlet manifold pressure. Ergo, it is common for the boost sense line to be attached to the plenum. Read more boost controller threads on this very forum for evidence of that.

What exactly do you mean by an EBC failing can totally destroy an engine? My EBC is an electro magnetic solenoid, as i thought most of them were. . If it fails, its open. Therefore only wastegate boost will be reached.

Any solenoid can fail open or closed. Also, the electronics can fail in such a way as to drive the solenoid to cause overboost.

Easy to install. On vac line from the intercooler piping, one from the actuator. One ground wire, and one signal wire. Hardly rocket science.

Still more work, including running stuff into the cabin, than the alternative.

An EBC doesnt "slam shut" a wastegate anyway. They are always shut. The EBC just doesnt let it open untill the desired boost is reached. Exactly the same principle as a manual boost Tee. I dont see what the issue is .

A wastegate is not an "open or closed" digital device. They are a modulated analog device. If the boost sense line is taken from the plenum and the throttle is mostly closed, then the wastegate could well be shut when it would be better for it to be partially open.

Granted, this is only a transitory effect, as the mostly closed throttle will unload the engine and hence reduce the exhaust flow and take the turbo off boost anyway.....but it is a real effect.

Sounds to me like you have had an issue before so totally rubbish every other EBC on the market because of it.

No. I have never installed an EBC on my car. Have never had a bad experience with one. My pneumatic one works just fine, and I don't need to keep up with the Jones. But I have seen more than one problematical EBC installation. Some caused by the EBC equipment itself, and quite a few caused by people not understanding what they were installing.

I wasn't rubbishing EBCs. I made a few very valid points about why non electronic controllers are not "dodgy" and pointed out that EBCs are not magical devices with no problems. Reading skills required.

Edited by GTSBoy

Your actually right. I did misread some of your points. Perks of forum browsing on a phone perhaps.

I still dont see the difficulty in installation. If your going for full electronic boost control, chances are you have an aftermarket ECU that does it anyway. So for the boost control to fail, the ECU itself would have to be failing wouldnt it? And if you have an aftermaket ECU, the stock solenoid is no longer required, therefore, you have a signal and an earth wire already run to the ECU free, all you need to do is turn the output on.

I totally agree with your point on setting up closed loop. I have no idea why anyone would even try set it up taking a line from a plenum. Stock is best IMO.

Maybe i totally ignored threads with anything about taking a EBC/boost tap feed from the plenum because its not how i do it. But i dont recall seeing much, and i hope people were put right. The only boost related item that should be plumbed into the plenum is a boost gauge. Not saying it wont work elsewhere, but it wont read vac lol.

Maybe one day if you get a chance you should have a go with an EBC (preferably an ECU controlled one). They are a pretty decent item. I had alot of fun setting up mine. RPM/Load based etc. Brings on full boost in my R33 with GT30 by 3400rpm.

I have logs of 17psi by 3200rpm too, this being 5th gear.. so kinda irrelevant as how often do you really do that :D

For me, any partial throttle just cruising, i want my wastegate shut tighter than a nuns honey pot. Any airflow the GT30 can give me at lower rpm the better. Or its just a pig to drive around town. Id wonder how a wastegate would be open at all with such low (no) pressure against it anyway. The actuator spring should be tight enough to keep it shut untill, if not just before the spring rating.

I use my solenoid to my advantage. As just before desired boost is reached, the wastegate starts to crack. Loosing boost. So i have the solenoid not allowing this. I guess thats a downside to an internal gate.

In the end, im always happy to be proven wrong. I like to learn, and make my setup the best it is capable of. (+ID1000, external gate and E85 would be nice... but hey, cant win em all!)

But there is more than one way to skin a cat. I built my own boost controller from a collection of pneumatic devices (relief valve, pressure regulator and one way valve) and it offers solid boost control.

Any chance you could show us this setup? I am planning a mechanical boost solution myself, Turbosmart can't supply more than 26psi of spring in their new external gates either.

My blitz DSBC with MAC valve seems to have run out of resolution and can't control boost (spikes sending the tune into overboost protection.) Plus you need a degree to tune the damn thing correctly. Pneumatic control sounds much better...

It's Julian Edgar's boost controller design from last century. I built it more or less as in the article, and it works well.

http://autospeed.com/cms/title_The-Audis-DIY-Boost-Control-Part-1/A_111348/article.html

http://autospeed.com/cms/title_The-Audis-DIY-Boost-Control-Part-2/A_111350/article.html

The exact same valves are still available, but there are plenty of other options. Running fairly high boost pressure, you might end up needing to set it up with the stiffer springs. But I could get 17+ psi with mine with the lower value springs. The one way valve to vent the air back out of it when off boost is essential. You can scrounge one out of any Toyota (they have about a zillion of them).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...