Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi to all, new to this forum but already have read a lot.

So in short, my Stagea has terrible fuel economy during active city driving (~30 liters per 100km) and has bad reaction on the throttle pedal (not always, though).

What has been done already: new maf, new o2, new knock sensor, whole new timing mechanism including both vtc pulleys and all chains, new injectors, new fuel pump with filter and many others.

Has a bigger intercooler, slightly highflowed turbo, 3 inch cat back, a/t transgo kit and cooler.

No leaks in the intake system, checked. Compression ok.

So the main problem is that the car runs 0.8 boost instead of 1.0 pactically all the time, and sometimes (mainly if started up in cold, but not strictly), first 10 minutes after start and warm up it goes 1.0 and pulls really hard.

My idea is that 0.8 boost happens because the car runs some kind of safe map (maybe knock map??), and for the same reason handles the throttle slower and smaller? Does anyone really know, how exactly a signal of knock affect the m35's behavior?

P.S. Sorry for bad English, not my native.

Edited by burkash
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/407829-m35-08-boost-issue/
Share on other sites

First of all, what fuel are you using? 91, 95, 98? With knock, you would see the ecu pull timing, not adjust fuel, I believe. It sounds like you have spent a load of money trying to fix it, which is sad. Might be worth asking one of the guys for a spare stock etc, and swap it over- see if it does the same thing. Could be a bad solder or something in the ecu itself.

As Scott asked, and check engine lights?

Lastly, how are you measuring consumption, and what kind of driving are you doing?

It's interesting that you mention the low boost thing; as I saw this while at the drags this week.

Normally I can stall the car against the brake, and the turbo will spool up to 15psi at around 3200rpm. It pushes hard against the brakes, churns the rear tyres, then takes off like a cut cat.

At the drags; the car would struggle to get to 2500rpm, and boost gauge was still in vacuum (it normally has around 5-7psi boost at that point). Once I'd done my run; I pulled over on the return road and was able to stall the car up as I can on the street.

As the engine was fully up to temp, I believe it is some kind of gearbox protection when cold; and it either retards the ignition timing or valve timing (or both) to limit boost. Once I was off the brake it would allow full boost. Throughout this I had full opening of the throttle.

It also does another thing, if I give it too much of a hard time when cold; it will limit boost to 7psi (regardless of RPM or throttle application) until I pull over, switch off the ignition & restart the car. Then it will give full boost.

I'm assuming this is an extension of the gearbox protection, as the engine will be at operating temp, but the car may not have been driven very far, thus a cold gearbox.

Is there a gearbox temp sender that could be giving erroneous feedback to the ECU, and limiting boost, retarding ignition timing and/or valve timing and giving you woeful fuel economy & performance?

It's interesting that you mention the low boost thing; as I saw this while at the drags this week.

Normally I can stall the car against the brake, and the turbo will spool up to 15psi at around 3200rpm. It pushes hard against the brakes, churns the rear tyres, then takes off like a cut cat.

At the drags; the car would struggle to get to 2500rpm, and boost gauge was still in vacuum (it normally has around 5-7psi boost at that point). Once I'd done my run; I pulled over on the return road and was able to stall the car up as I can on the street.

As the engine was fully up to temp, I believe it is some kind of gearbox protection when cold; and it either retards the ignition timing or valve timing (or both) to limit boost. Once I was off the brake it would allow full boost. Throughout this I had full opening of the throttle.

It also does another thing, if I give it too much of a hard time when cold; it will limit boost to 7psi (regardless of RPM or throttle application) until I pull over, switch off the ignition & restart the car. Then it will give full boost.

I'm assuming this is an extension of the gearbox protection, as the engine will be at operating temp, but the car may not have been driven very far, thus a cold gearbox.

Is there a gearbox temp sender that could be giving erroneous feedback to the ECU, and limiting boost, retarding ignition timing and/or valve timing and giving you woeful fuel economy & performance?

What you're talking about -- it's tranny overheat protection, I saw this several times before installing tranny cooler. This happened each time after driving very severely with flooring after each stop and rushing through traffic with lots of kickdown. The boost became limited to 0.5, and moreover the manual shift mode was unavailable.

Does the engine light light up at any time?

No, if that was so, it could be easier to dig in.

First of all, what fuel are you using? 91, 95, 98? With knock, you would see the ecu pull timing, not adjust fuel, I believe. It sounds like you have spent a load of money trying to fix it, which is sad. Might be worth asking one of the guys for a spare stock etc, and swap it over- see if it does the same thing. Could be a bad solder or something in the ecu itself.

As Scott asked, and check engine lights?

Lastly, how are you measuring consumption, and what kind of driving are you doing?

The fuel is 98. strictly, and from different stations. Even tried some additives, no difference.

I didn't say, but I've already tried to change the ecu, overall the car goes better, but the problem stays.

I measure the consumption in the right way, driving full tank to empty, and then seeing how much fuel gets into there.

As I've said -- I do rather active city driving, but to compare, recently I used a w211 e320 for about a month (3.2 liter diesel engine, 500+Nm and 180Hp), flooring it very often and maybe going even faster than on my Stagea -- I had 11-12 liter per 100. The car weighs nearly the same and has a similar stupid 5AT, of course it is diesel, but not so much difference..

Edited by burkash

What you're talking about -- it's tranny overheat protection, I saw this several times before installing tranny cooler. This happened each time after driving very severely with flooring after each stop and rushing through traffic with lots of kickdown. The boost became limited to 0.5, and moreover the manual shift mode was unavailable.

As I've said -- I do rather active city driving, but to compare, recently I used a w211 e320 for about a month (3.2 liter diesel engine, 500+Nm and 180Hp), flooring it very often and maybe going even faster than on my Stagea -- I had 11-12 liter per 100. The car weighs nearly the same and has a similar stupid 5AT, of course it is diesel, but not so much difference..

I don't believe the issue I had at the drags was an overheat condition. Car had been sitting stationary, turned off for 45mins each time at the track; not a chance it was overheated. Also; my manual shift was unaffected. Also, the problem was reduced once I deliberately soaked some heat into the system; just not enough unfortunately.

In any case, I run a large external cooler; and the car had only driven a kilometre or so.

Comparing your Stagea's fuel economy to that of a Turbo Diesel Merc is not even close to a fair comparison.

To be using over twice the fuel you must be blowing a fair bit of black smoke out the back, either that or you have a fuel leak...

That was not me who said twice :)

Not twice, I suppose 18-19 liters according to the car weight and my driving habits.

Have got no leaks and no petrol smell..

And no black smoke, I mean no smoke that could be seen in the rear view mirror.

Edited by burkash

And to be mentioned, the car also starts very poor, but not always. Sometimes it starts instantly, but mainly requires to hold the key for 2-3 secs. Didn't notice any connection with temperature or any other things.

Edited by burkash

What fuel pump did you install? New stock injectors?

Yes, injectors are stock, 16600aa500

The fuel pump is Walbro, but frankly I don't like how it fitted into the case -- it was 1cm too long, so required some additional work to be installed.

Glad you asked about the pump, please tell me, what pump fits perfectly?

Edited by burkash

Did you do a search before fitting it? There are a few mods required to the pump for it to fit like a glove. I generally use the 342.

The reason your car is running like crap is probably because you never ran direct power to the pump. Walbro pumps require 14v continuous, and the factory fuel pump only gets 8v or so at idle and cruise. Use the original pump wires to power a relay and run some nice thick power wire down to the pump. Make sure you fuse it.

Did you do a search before fitting it? There are a few mods required to the pump for it to fit like a glove. I generally use the 342.

The reason your car is running like crap is probably because you never ran direct power to the pump. Walbro pumps require 14v continuous, and the factory fuel pump only gets 8v or so at idle and cruise. Use the original pump wires to power a relay and run some nice thick power wire down to the pump. Make sure you fuse it.

Thanks, will try to do this today.

Just to save some time, don't you remember the color of wires powering the pump?

BTW, the problem didn't occur with walbro install, it was the same with the factory pump.

The factory pump may have been shagged. Not saying this is the only issue but I have seen many problems with the Walbro's run at lower voltage.

The power wires to the pump at the tank end are black with a yellow line (+ I think) and green with a red line (negative). They are the two thicker wires to the plug.

Where do you live?

There is the option of going for a drive and Logging your ECU including Injector Pulse Width, and then comparing to other cars. Some people have the powers :ph34r:

As long as you don't think your the next Shumi...

The factory pump may have been shagged. Not saying this is the only issue but I have seen many problems with the Walbro's run at lower voltage.

The power wires to the pump at the tank end are black with a yellow line (+ I think) and green with a red line (negative). They are the two thicker wires to the plug.

Thanks, Scott. Will try to do this today. Just to bla-bla, you mean in some situation the car lacks fuel and determines a knock, then falls into safe mode?

Where do you live?

There is the option of going for a drive and Logging your ECU including Injector Pulse Width, and then comparing to other cars. Some people have the powers :ph34r:

As long as you don't think your the next Shumi...

I'm from Russia.

But this could be a good idea, thanks.

Possibly, the o2 sensor should try to compensate to some extent, but generally the Walbro's will make the car run like crap when the pump goes into its low voltage setting. Hopefully the rewire makes a difference for you.

Have you checked all the breather and cooler piping for leaks? Perhaps a pressure test of the intake is in order...

I'm from Russia.

But this could be a good idea, thanks.

Always wanted to go to Russia! I'll log, if you fly and put me up! :P

My walbro isn't direct wired, but my car is tuned for what it is at the moment, and being a non return,is different anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...