Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i know of several cases where people with mines ecu's have grenaded motors while running stock boost. Its not the AFR's that are the problem on mines ecu's, its the timing maps (which is why they generally make a car feel GREAT! that much timing brings it alive! but dangerously)

Yea...Ive seen one run ridiculous timing on low load. Was up to high 50s :w00t:

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Iv always been interested to know whether Mines ecu's were actually truly a good and relatively safe tune on the vehicle it was originally tuned for and any other things the tuners might have done to make it work in some more safe way. Or were they always 'go-GO-BOOM' boxes...

Iv always been interested to know whether Mines ecu's were actually truly a good and relatively safe tune on the vehicle it was originally tuned for and any other things the tuners might have done to make it work in some more safe way. Or were they always 'go-GO-BOOM' boxes...

Guessing it has to do with higher quality fuel in Japan.

100 RON is available in Japan, 98 RON is available in Australia. Higher the RON, higher the knock resistance. In simple terms, the Mine's basemap at the most basic level will be based about the knock resistance of 100 RON and what can be safely done with it. Put in a lesser fuel (98 RON) and it's obvious what is going to happen.

Shell phased out V-Power Racing in 2008, it was the only 100 RON fuel that I was aware of, even then it was regular 98 + 5% ethanol to bring it up to 100. Apparently United have 100 RON (haven't seen any in SA), but it's 10% ethanol.

Shell phased out V-Power Racing in 2008, it was the only 100 RON fuel that I was aware of, even then it was regular 98 + 5% ethanol to bring it up to 100. Apparently United have 100 RON (haven't seen any in SA), but it's 10% ethanol.

I've seen 100 at united, but only once.

Lavington united just out side albury is the only one I've seen

probably a good thing im thinking?

Not many people realise but our motors are frequently experiencing mild detonation events, its impossible to tune out all cases of det, hence why detonation is only deemed an issue above a certain amount. They are so smal they cannot be heard by the ear and they dont present any immediate threat to the motor. But it isnt good for it bottom line. Increasing your octane can help to reduce this.

What i am not sure about is how the effect of that level of ethanol content will effect a motor tuned for 100% petroleum. Another person might be able to answer that...

yes... but octane boosters are known to foul sensors- i.e. your 02 sensors in the exhaust as well as wear spark plugs quicker.

Id say put some in myself, iv never had anyt trouble with it tho i use the 'dyno tabs' which are meant to cause this sort of problem less.

Otherwise dont hammer it or even boost it if you can help it. Nor drive it in hot condiitons or with a heap of people in the car.

Its not like this ecu is likely to harm your motor between now n the time you get a new ecu and tune- 'its made it this far already'. But it would sure be a shame to have ur new car and its built motor go up in flames because of it...

Edited by jjman

A fair few United in VIC now have 100RON, have had most of the year and I used it religiously. Could certainly notice a differene with the added RON and the slight change in mixture due to Ethanol.

I give it the big thumbs up if you can get your hands on it. Economy was the same :)

Shell phased out V-Power Racing in 2008, it was the only 100 RON fuel that I was aware of, even then it was regular 98 + 5% ethanol to bring it up to 100. Apparently United have 100 RON (haven't seen any in SA), but it's 10% ethanol.

Which United do you go to?

I haven't seen one without 100RON in over a year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...