Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me what brand this roof spoiler is, as I want to get one, price permitting, and where I could find one?

I believe there maybe a few variants of this type which mount flush & low onto the roof. Brand names appreciated.

:thanks:

post-4392-0-57031400-1347952893_thumb.jpg

post-4392-0-33264900-1347952904_thumb.jpg

post-4392-0-39860900-1347953531_thumb.jpg

Edited by YEE-HAA
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409555-anyone-know-what-this-spoiler-is/
Share on other sites

The label on the box has its part number as K6050-AQ050 I bought this through the dealer I bought my Stag from. It cost $1,612 and I've still got to paint it, but it does come with everything to mount it including bolts, brake light and tubes.

M35 Stagea spoiler-roof K6050-AQ050

Interestingly the part number stamped on the spoiler is K6050-AQXXX. As Alex says maybe they are colour sensitive. Mine is primed in a pale grey.

If I was looking again, I would get a second hand one from Import Monster (Alex's links), given that either way you probably have to get it painted. Although that second one is already your colour, doesn't look scuffed and you would get a spare glass hatch as well.

Cheers

Edited by QJQ

The label on the box has its part number as K6050-AQ050 I bought this through the dealer I bought my Stag from. It cost $1,612 and I've still got to paint it, but it does come with everything to mount it including bolts, brake light and tubes.

FAAAAAAAAARRRKRKRKK! :unsure:

I got a Takero's Carbon Fibre one for $550 landed off IM!

Edited by Jetwreck

it's this one lol.....not on the car yet though.....should have it on next Monday.

post-37023-0-24804100-1348267900_thumb.png

you suck lol... i have a full takeros kit and been hunting for a decent takeros spoiler for a while, i have the CF bonnet, one of those would set my c34 right off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...