Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wanting to know what everyone thinks re order of works, brands and models etc. Like a menu reference for someone like me and others with a Stagea and new to modifying.

I.e

Fmic best suited.

Safe boost for stock turbo.

What larger turbo to use.

Etc etc etc.

But broken down into

1.

2.

3.

With what other owners have done.

Regards.

Justin

It would help to know how much money you want to spend over what period of time and if you have a power goal but some very basics:

1. 3in turbo back exhaust.

2. High flow panel filter for your airbox (supposing you still have the stock airbox).

3. Bypass the boost solenoid and get a cheap boost T (or an expensive electronic boost controller if your'e so inclined) and run about 10psi.

4. Heavy duty sway bar (anti-roll bar) for the rear e.g. Whiteline BNR11 XX 24mm) which will dramatically improve cornering.

5. Plan to get a brand new fuel pump.

Check to see if your auto fluid has been replaced (ever) and think about getting a S2 or aftermarket trans cooler. Replace your brake fluid with something like Motul RBF600. Check your rotors and if ok get some quality pads next time.

Have a look around this forum for lots more ideas of how to lighten your wallet and make your car better! Read the RB25DET turbo upgrade in the forced induction section for examples of mods and what they have acheived.

Basic mods people do:

Turbo back exhaust- better flowing especially in top end.

FMIC- depending on plans for car.

Boost controller- increase boost, standard turbo 10psi, 12 Max.

Air filter- panel better in standard box as said above.

Sway bars- front and rear if possible for best handling.

Strut braces- ordered through importer from Japan.

Coolers- oil, trans, depending on Wat car will be used for.

Turbos- high flow of standard, high flow + 3076 internal conversion an frot housing changed, 3076r. All with braided lines.

Brakes- better pads, and new rotors, or upgrade to r33 or r34 brakes with slotted rotors and good pads, or brembo with more modifications.

Head work- cams, cam gears, oil restrictors (I believe are needed in the neo's.

Suspension-full adjustable arms

Coilovers/lowered springs- depends on wat the owner prefers interms of stiffness and adjustability and use of car as too Wat is best for the car.

This is basic list. Depending on price and how far u want to go. And Wat the car is used for. On phone so can't put wat is best when. But as most people would hopefully think he same, always try to upgrade ur handling and brakes (ie safety stuff) before starting in power. I find ways the point in the power if the car can't stop or handle a corner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...