Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 Rb25Det To Rb25Det Neo Conversion..?

Hardkandy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hardkandy Newbie

Hardkandy

Posted
Posted

Hey guys.. im new to the forum and thought id get in straight away and try to get an answer to my question..

I have just bought my first r32 and it has had a rb25det conversion from the previous owner.. when i bought the car the motor has been blown and i now have to swap it out for another..

I have a mate that is willing to sell me an rb25det neo on the cheap.. good kms and good engine.. I would like to put it into my 32 but have been reading that this conversion is a little bit of a pain in the behind due to different wiring etc.. My questions...

Is this conversion worth it?

Will i have heaps of problems with the wiring?

Any parts i will have to change or are most interchangable?

Has anyone done this before?

Is there a wiring service that i can send the loom/looms to that can wire it for me?

I would love all the information anyone can muster at this stage.. as I want my car up and running...

Thanks in advance!! ;)

post-100417-0-89125600-1350462175_thumb.jpg

adamskill Mentor

adamskill

Posted
Posted

there should be plenty of info if you have a search on the forums.

i wouldnt think there would be a great deal of difference between a 25det and a neo 25det, especially when all the hard work has been done already swapping the rb20 for an rb25 in the past

Miguelone Grand Master

Miguelone

Posted
Posted

there should be plenty of info if you have a search on the forums.

i wouldnt think there would be a great deal of difference between a 25det and a neo 25det, especially when all the hard work has been done already swapping the rb20 for an rb25 in the past

Wiring wise the Neo is completely different to the R33 25's. The head is also a fair bit different. I'm wondering though how a Neo would run on earlier electronics, would save a lot of f**k around as you'd basically just need to pull and replace the engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
×
×
  • Create New...