Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So im new here, and to Skylines in general.

Not sure if this the right section, but here goes.

Quick run down on car,

1993 S2 R33

RB25DET manual

Pod Filter

3" cat back exhaust

rest is stock.

Problem is.

its very hard to start first thing of the day, sorta like a carby car you gotta hold the throttle while cranking. once it kicks in the revs will jump to around 1200 till warm. rest of day its 1 crank start.. weird.

Once warm the idle drops to 900, all seems sweet. Till you touch the throttle slightly, the revs drop and you can actually make the car stall by doing this. press throttle slightly more and it will spring to life, sorta feels like a flat spot from 900-1000?. if you give it a slight rev to say 3-4k and back off the revs will drop to 500ish and then bounce back too 900 and hunt around the 750-950 mark. couple small revs to "clear it out" and she idles fine at 900.

Now before this the idle was hunting around the 500-900 mark, i pulled the ACC assembly out as per the DIY on here. cleaned it all, followed the idle reset guide and waaam, the idle is great at a solid 900. but then it came back :(

Im at a loss to what to check next? im thinking give the AFM a clean as per the guide on here,

Also curious if coil packs will cause such a issue?

Any help is appreciated, or links, guides, directions ect.

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/412719-weird-idle-hard-to-start-when-cold/
Share on other sites

Catch can has been bought, ive noticed a little oil in intake and pipes for cooler.

I was thinking when its sitting there idle a little oil gets in, got to hit the gas and the oil has cover plugs slightly? is that possible?

On a weird note, turning the AC on removes this issue though it only bumps idle to 1050ish. enough to pass "flat spot".. its how ive been driving ATM otherwise it feels like it will conk out, or splutter when i go to take off.

will the AFM cause the bad cold start? im assuming not

cleaned the AFM, installed catch can and a FMIC.

runs soooo much better now. still after a big rev idle will drop to 500 and bounce back to 900 and sit there.

cold starts still a hassle, time to clean the cold start valve thingy under manifold???

AAC auxiliary air control, is the one under the plenum.. used for cold starts etc.. and has that hose connected to the crossover pipe

IAV Idle some valve is the one attached to the side of the plenum, used for idle

  • 3 weeks later...

Still hard to start in morning,

i have to attempt to start it 4-5 times, then a little pedal work to get it to actually start. then it will hover at 500rpm for 2-3 seconds, then cold valve kicks in and bam, 1800rpm for warm up.

Idle is perfect now,

If your car starts fine in the cold with the pedal pressed a little, it seems like your AAC (under the plenum) is playing up. The IAV only controls idle NOT high idle for cold starts.

You say stock, but you don't have an aftermarket BOV do you?

Sounds like a couple of problems.

1 - Slight leak in the vacuum lines (remove each line from the plenum during fast idle and if removing one doesn't make a difference then it's probably leaking).

2 - Get some upper engine cleaner (Nulon). Follow the directions on the can. But you don't need to bother with the squirting into the pistons, etc. Just clean the plenum and AAC/IAV.

HINT use a fast idle for both of the above ~1200rpm: Get a folded piece of paper or business card and use it as a slight spacer ~2mm on the throttle body. (Between the throttle stop and the accelerator cable). Gives you a nice fast idle ~1200rpm.

Edited by simpletool

Yeah stock BOV mate, it makes a noise why replace it? haha

Yeah i may just get some vacuum line and replace what i can anyway.

How do i go about getting the AAC off from under the plenum? not much room to work around.

get a small 1/4" socket set and an uni-joint.. you'll manage, after some beers and loads of swearing :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...