Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL looks like your the guniea pig. :)

Blew a late 1UZ on the dyno last night, the limit of its compressed powder rods was 300kw on ethanol. It made massive torque though before it fractured.

Eventually something will fail, the gamble is when and at what torque.

  • Like 1

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Khaled, where are you getting yours tuned? Edge? I think your pushing your luck on a stock bottom end....once your around 400Kw on a RB26 and its a stock bottom end its no longer the tuner, some serious physics start to come into play, rod bolts stretch, big ends and piston pins start deforming, factory piston ring lands can only take so much.

Better talk to Barry about the costs of a forged bottom end before you fry it and end up with the car off the road and a big repair bill......your walking into high risk unchartered territory IMHO.

Then again you and Stef never listen to anyone anyway. :P

Edited by GTRPSI

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Edge. I hope Barry isn't too pissed about the mess on the floor.

Luckily it was only at 3k, it would have made one hell of a mess at 7. No wonder they park that old Ford beside the dyno. lol.

  • Like 1

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Khaled, where are you getting yours tuned? Edge? I think your pushing your luck on a stock bottom end....once your around 400Kw on a RB26 and its a stock bottom end its no longer the tuner, some serious physics start to come into play, rod bolts stretch, big ends and piston pins start deforming, factory piston ring lands can only take so much.

Better talk to Barry about the costs of a forged bottom end before you fry it and end up with the car off the road and a big repair bill......your walking into high risk unchartered territory IMHO.

Then again you and Stef never listen to anyone anyway. :P

I never once said I wanted 400kw though? I was just curious to know how many more people have accomplished this since this thread has started.

Also quite a few people are running 400+ on a stock 26 on e85. Its amazing how strong these rb's are.

Edited by drgtr7

I never once said I wanted 400kw though? I was just curious to know how many more people have accomplished this since this thread has started.

Also quite a few people are running 400+ on a stock 26 on e85. Its amazing how strong these rb's are.

Your not that far away now on 98 correct?

Nah you never said 400Kw...but your going to end up around it by the looks of things if you go E85. :)

I thought i heard Stef mention your were fiitting a E85 sensor to yours at JAK (or am i mixing you up with someone else)?

Yes RB's are strong, but get the revs up and thats when the strain starts to show, note Scotts comments about the engine he lost on E85 at 3K, allbeit with 1UZ stock rods.

@ Scotty, What do you think it was, the slow burn of the E85 putting out too much cyllinder pressure/torque on the rods, what sort of numbers were seen around the RPM when it popped, or do you think the rod was stressed from a previous dyno run when at song and bound to fail on the next run?

Bah, its only oil and frag to be cleaned, as long as any metal didnt meet any customers cars nearby, probably hear all about it next week.

Is your EVO back on the road?

Edited by GTRPSI

My car makes 800nm on the Edge dyno, the Soarer was making 1200nm at 10psi. Torque is what kills rods I imagine, and this had it in bulk. It would have been stressed from the previous runs, but the sintered rods just fracture and let go, no bending etc like you would see on a forged rod before it failed.

Yes, the Evo is running, just a few small issues to sort out and I can fit the 1400's and tune it.

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
  • 2 years later...

Thread bump

Update on my stock bottom end.

made 480-500kw on JEM's dyno with a 8374 w 1.05 rear on e85

- Mild head work with small cams

- stock crank, rods and pistons

- stock oil pump and sump

Ran 10.7 @ 134mph on 28ish psi in Sydney summary with 8374. Probably could go 136-138mph in the winter....

Am now inthe processing of upgrading to a 9180 w 1.05 rear.

Depending on how brave I'm feeling I'll tell the tuner to cap the power at 570kw-600kw (on JEM's dyno). It should be good for 140-145 mph.

Long live the stock bottom end.

Lots of big power stock bottom ends floating around. Would love to hear updates on the setups, particularly with:

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot)

- turbo with rear housing and psi

- basic engine mods

- fuel

Cheers

  • Like 2
42 minutes ago, usmair said:

Long live the stock bottom end.

Lots of big power stock bottom ends floating around. Would love to hear updates on the setups, particularly with:

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot)

- turbo with rear housing and psi

- basic engine mods

- fuel

Cheers

My first motor died after about 4 years with varying levels of power from 450kw to 550kw. It died a sad death when it dropped a valve guide (it had actually dropped 11 of them but the others had shot out the exhaust). Bottom end was still mint when it came out.

New motor has been going a few years with 520-567kw with a few different cam combos. Seems to love life and gets driven fairly hard at the track a lot and 1000m drags.

 

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot) 567kw on a dynapack hub dyno

- turbo with rear housing and psi Precision 6262 0.84 with just over 30psi

- basic engine mods mild ported head and smallish cams

- fuel United E85

  • Like 3
  • 3 months later...

Ok. Bit of an update 

Car is now running an EFR 9180. Still factory Nissan bottom end with factory pump and sump.

On 35 psi it made 580kw on JEMs dyno. 

Recent Sydney winter weather has been bumping up the boost and it's hit 39 psi a few times now and still survived. 

On 39 psi you'd think it'd be 610-630kw on the same dyno....??

 

20180519_211350.jpg

On 2/2/2018 at 1:41 PM, SimonR32 said:

My first motor died after about 4 years with varying levels of power from 450kw to 550kw. It died a sad death when it dropped a valve guide (it had actually dropped 11 of them but the others had shot out the exhaust). Bottom end was still mint when it came out.

New motor has been going a few years with 520-567kw with a few different cam combos. Seems to love life and gets driven fairly hard at the track a lot and 1000m drags.

 

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot) 567kw on a dynapack hub dyno

- turbo with rear housing and psi Precision 6262 0.84 with just over 30psi

- basic engine mods mild ported head and smallish cams

- fuel United E85

Up to 582kw these days (Mainline hub dyno), ran a 9.6 @ 146mph so power and speed match fairly well

Edited by SimonR32
  • Like 2
  • 7 months later...

Thread bump and update

So I ran 10.4 at 140.6 mph with the EFR 9180 at 2018 GTR festival. Turned it up to 11 for the next run and broke a rear shaft so only got one decent run.

Upon inspection of the Haltech data log we discovered the turbo was hitting 30 psi from 1 to 4th and would only see 35psi in 5th gear so safe to say I was a 50-60 KW short on the run. Profec B no good...

I now have boost by gear set up via an eboost2 and the the car has 37psi shoved down its throat with it tapering off to 34psi by redline.

Should help the MPH a bit I'd say

Ready to head back out to WSID once Sydney weather cools. 

A 9 second pass with a stock bottom end and 34 getrag is the goal. Don't think it's ever been done before,  especially in the heavier 33 GTR.... ??

Still all factory Nissan parts from the head down

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...