Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and girls.

My check engine light came on Friday and has been off and on since. I rushed to my mechanic today to have a diagnostic test run and have found code 21.

Can anyone recommend someone who can help me out who won't stuff me around or rip me off?

I have an idea of what needs to be done but would like to go to someone who knows R34's well.

Unfortunatly my mechanic is unable to assist me further and I am looking to find another that I know people trust.

I would love to hear some positive experiences from more knowledgable enthusiasts such as yourselves.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/413521-diagnostic-scan-code-21/
Share on other sites

At work at the moment but from memory - consult error 21 is ignition, most likely coil packs?

PM sent regarding mechanic who has both, the knowledge and the parts readily available.

Cheers.

Just thinking - has anything been tried so far in an attempt to fix?

Let me know if you need a hand.

Edited by iwanta34gtr

If you're after new coilpacks I can't recommend yellowjackets enough.

Mine were on the way out, giving me a horrid misfire under any kind of load. Popped the yellowjackets in and it's been great since. $440 delivered if I remember correctly. Really simple job too.

Thanks guys! It's most likely the coilpacks unfortunatly. $$$ :-(

Organised to have her looked at this afternoon. Thanks Andrew. Going to get a professional to do it as I would probably do it all wrong.

Just want to pay the money and get it done and move on. :-)

I'll let you know how it all goes!

Thanks for all the help! :-)

Well my baby has spent the night at the mechanics. New coilpacks coming in today also having the sparkplugs changed while I'm at it. Wasn't too serious. We found that the coilpack for cylinder 5 was being lazy! Look forward to picking her up this afternoon! :-)

Thanks again for all the support. I hope to one day be as knowledgable as you guys. Clearly I have a lot to learn! :-)

Edited by Jennie 1990

Thanks Owen. I feel a bit better about it all now. Well the learning has begun! :-)

Today was a no go though. The parts came in late this afternoon damaged in transit. :-(

New coil packs on the way express good to go for tomorrow! So I'll head there again after work. Couldn't spend another day without her. Looking forward to tomorrow afternoon when she'll be back and better then ever!

Hey Marsss! Hope you're well.

Coil packs being sent from a supplier in Queensland not Japan.

I try to always keep an open mind but after doing some investigation I look forward to seeing what this afternoon has in store for me!

Nice one! and "overnight parts from Japan hey? yr doing well....

why do people call them "liners"??? :rant: they're not liners.. if anything, they're "lines" :domokun:

carry on

Why do people call service stations "servos" if anything they should be called "services"

Or even more so, bottle-o's, "bottles" makes a lot more sense!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...