Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Perez always had high potential to disappoint. He is Button with the volume turned all the way up. Capable of having crackign drives, but they are stratedy dependent...not pace.

So Kobi seemed quicker over a lap. Often had better race pace....just did not have the strength of pace over long stints on alternate strategies. Didnt Kobi outscore Perez last year?

Yeh, so until he shows some actual pace in a car over a lap or the optimum race strategy...not the roll of dice I am a long way from being convinced by the guy. I think DiResta is going to get damaged by the new and improved Sutil much like he was by Hulk getting his eye back in. McLaren really missed the train not getting Hulk on board who himself needs work but has the basics covered

But is the Hulk really that much better an option?

If you simplify it down to a pure points-per-race average (which I did- you're welcome) Nico vs Checo sees NH come out slightly ahead with 2.14 plays 2.00

Hardly earth shattering.

I still hold out hope Perez can prove more useful than Heikki in the long run.

I'm with Roy. Perez only got a few decent results when the 'go long, go slow' strategy worked out. If F1 was about racing and going fast, he would never have been looked at as the next big thing. And now, the very thing that made him look good a few times has turned against him! With the 2013 extra-degrading Pirellis, it doesn't look like he'll get the chance to make that strategy work because everyone's having to do the long slow strategy just to make it to a normal pitstop window! So far this year the Hard tyre has only lasted 1 lap longer than the Medium in the race they were used. No chance to make one less stop.

I'm with Roy. Perez only got a few decent results when the 'go long, go slow' strategy worked out. If F1 was about racing and going fast, he would never have been looked at as the next big thing. And now, the very thing that made him look good a few times has turned against him! With the 2013 extra-degrading Pirellis, it doesn't look like he'll get the chance to make that strategy work because everyone's having to do the long slow strategy just to make it to a normal pitstop window! So far this year the Hard tyre has only lasted 1 lap longer than the Medium in the race they were used. No chance to make one less stop.

Like Roy says McLaren have the long/slow strategy covered off with Button. So why sign Perez???? Hulkenburg has shown he has speed over a single lap - claiming pole in a Williams and did well in the Force India last year - particularly late on in the season. Probably too late. Di Resta is no muppet either. Anyway I cant see McLaren winning a race this year. Hope I'm wrong.

meh @ vettel & perez..

heikki is back for two friday sessions with caterham.

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8649084/Heikki-I-m-here-to-help-the-team

and i'm thinking about importing a caterham.

Perez is useless....anyway too much talk about perez.

lets get back on topic. Vettel is a dog and going to be whipped like one this weekend

actually, let's stick with this- Nico has already driven for a big name team, and hasn't really achieved much more than Sergio has

hint: they have 7 drivers titles, 9 constructors and 114 race wins

How many of them in the last 15 years? Their 2010 car was such a dog it should have been left chained to a fence somewhere. Actually that is a little harsh. The 2011 car was worse. Maybe this years is too.

p1 Times
01 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:34.487 11 laps
02 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:34.564 +0.077 19 laps
03 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:34.621 +0.134 22 laps
04 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:34.790 +0.303 20 laps
05 Paul di Resta Force India 1:34.949 +0.462 17 laps
06 Jenson Button McLaren 1:35.069 +0.582 22 laps
07 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:35.101 +0.614 19 laps
08 Adrian Sutil Force India 1:35.119 +0.632 19 laps
09 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:35.345 +0.858 17 laps
10 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:35.611 +1.124 14 laps
11 Sergio Perez McLaren 1:35.640 +1.153 23 laps
12 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:35.783 +1.296 16 laps
13 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:35.792 +1.305 16 laps
14 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:36.014 +1.527 19 laps
15 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:36.485 +1.998 20 laps
16 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:36.498 +2.011 17 laps
17 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1:36.755 +2.268 20 laps
18 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1:37.214 +2.727 21 laps
19 Charles Pic Caterham 1:37.850 +3.363 20 laps
20 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:38.401 +3.914 20 laps
21 Max Chilton Marussia 1:39.445 +4.958 12 laps
22 Rodolfo Gonzalez Marussia 1:40.215 +5.728 7 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8651878/Massa-Leads-A-Ferrari-1-2-In-Bahrain

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...