Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks jeremy.. I read through it and still not convinced. Noone gave a definate reason as to why?? There were too many variables left unopen, and for me anyway, and as you would know, alot peer group posting without really facts as to why? The only conclusion I could figure, was Oil starvation, and perhaps boost above 1.5-6 bar?? But stil no hard facts, sure 2-3guys blew there's up, but I'm sure my tuners could blow my HKS 2530's in a day if they wanted to.. Dunno, me personally I'm still inclined to take the advice of ICE & Ben's.

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I may not know the intricacies of tuning, but wtf has boost got to do with running rich/lean? Sounds more like your tuner hasn't got his fuel mapping correct than whether you're running too much boost...

I'm running 2530s at 19psi and my AFR is sitting dead on 12.0, I don't know why you'd want to run these turbos at a lower boost pressure than that.

Actuall I dare say my tuner has a damn good idea as to what he's doing. Its running rich because we tuned it to run rich, once plugs got cleaned/serviced they started flowing even more so its running richer again therefore need to retune.

As for boost I dont need to run more than 1 bar with even a very safe/rich tune to attain power figures there fore if we lean it out I can safely lower the boost to still achieve satisfactory figures that was my points.

Meshmesh turbos seem good reason i was just saying save for a new engine is due to a rough limit of 450rwhp for a RB26DETT stock internals imho.. its a safe benchmark to try to keep to. Thats just me though *shrugs*

Jack, that is an awsome effort. good to see people looking outside the square, and trying domething different. I cant wait to see a side, by side compairson of the t51z and 2530's should be great!!

also

Its running rich because we tuned it to run rich

doesnt that defeat the meaning of 'tuning'?

once plugs got cleaned/serviced they started flowing even more so its running richer again

WTF!!!! First time i have ever heard of plugs being able to flow? flow what? and how if they do 'flow' does it make the engine run richer?

sorry but my limited knowledge of cars and tuning cannot comprehend what you are talking about. Is it just me?

Jack - great results mate! Very happy for you and its great to finally have your car back on the road.

The final dyno figure was a little lower than expected wasn't it however?

You guys have to wait for my turbo to get done for the comparison day so we can add a thrid comparision considering they should all be similar in power but with different turbo set-ups.

Although I broke my 3rd gear syncro today at Sandown so my turbo plans may be put on the back-burner depending on how much it costs to repair.

I'm just waiting to get my conrods and injectors back from testing, and then I'm all set to go :(:D:) :) :)

I'll even try to get my car down to Melbourne to do a comparison dyno day with you guys if it's feasible!

Great result Jack!

running things a little rich up top is a very smart idea. Sure you can probably nab another 20rwhp but, at the cost of a much finer margin for error outside the tuning environment. The dyno is not the track or road, and as such AFR's can vary enough to screw your engine if it's not tuned with a decent fall back. Also if summoner can make that sort of power at 1 bar thats a great bonus to engine longevity. Shame about not running AFM's on the Wolf tho'. It's not like RB20 AFM's are that expensive as an uprgrade on the RB26.

Thanks guys for your comments...

summoner- looks like you are running bigger turbos (2540s) than me, therefore its probably safe you keep them at 1 bar as they are known for making great power, but very poor response and lag..... I know a lot of guys running 320rwkws on standard engines and haven't had any problems. My AFR's are right on 12 all the way through the rev range, so I don't see why I should be screwing up my engine any time soon....

And remember, it's not all about power!!!! It's how its delivered... My car is no dyno queen..

NRB- Amen

jezrrr- yes I have read the thread, but rebuilding the turbos over time doesn't really concern me. Do you know what it costs to rebuild the turbos??? You'll be surprised....

Got an oil cooler going on next week, so that should help???

meshmesh- great points raised there, just to remind people I'm not implying that these turbos are better than any other turbo out there, its more to enlighten people on what T517s are capable of, and compare them to 2530s in relation to lag, response and power..

Aphex- cheers, good points raised there too...

RedR32- yeah comparison should be good..

Snowman- power is what I was after, around 320rwkws (not in shootout mode).. Don't know others were expecting... don't forget I'm running 1.3 bar, there's plenty left in it....

Merli- your car is going to be an absolute f@#$ing weapon, you'll be running much higher boost than me, so it would be interesting to see what the GT-SS's will be capable of.... I can definetly say that they won't be as laggy than mine!!!!! Can't wait to see the results...

rev210- spot on!!!

JAG, you'd be very suprised at the responce of these turbo's.. we over layed my dyno chart to that of an R34 gt-r on 1 bar with usuall fmic/zorst combo and even before i make 1bar boost its producing more power than the r34 is at its 1 bar peak.

Your setup seems to be a fantastic street setup and will be lethal at the circuit/drags due to responce/lack of lag :)

cool, just from what I've heard that 2540s are very laggy, but make great power

I hope to prove this wrong. Had strong mid range on my std (but tired) RB26 with 25/40s. The adjustable cam gears helped to reduce the lag considerably.

With new cams and zaust manifolds going on as part of the rebuild, I hope to have a torque curve as wide as Summoners but with a higher peak (+500 hp).

Engine should be back from the machine shop this week, so maybe a few weeks away yet if all goes well.

Merli- your car is going to be an absolute f@#$ing weapon, you'll be running much higher boost than me, so it would be interesting to see what the GT-SS's will be capable of.... I can definetly say that they won't be as laggy than mine!!!!! Can't wait to see the results...

I'll only be running 1.3-1.4 bar... That's all these turbos are made for... They're a lot smaller than your T517z-10cm2 turbos...

I'm hoping for 300-ish @ the wheels, so we'll see if the response and mid-range make up for the lack of top end...

Here's hoping! :P

ph1- do you mind telling us when full boost hits on your setup???

Merli- surely you should be able to run more than that, even just to get the numbers on the 1/4 mile???

sydneykit- I've got one going on next week, 16 row Trust item with oil relocation...

INASNT- should be happening in the next couple of weeks, will keep you informed....

Well theres a few differences in our setups, mine are the t517z-8cm2 turbos, and I have Tomei 260in/ex 10.8mm camshafts.

I'm not sure when full boost hits, but my graph is a lot different to yours. Ben actually overlayed my graph on one of his better standard turbo tunes (250+rwkw) and mine was making more power (15rwkw or so) at 4000rpm than the standard turbos.

When I get home this evening I'll try to find some scans of my graphs, I have a couple, one is 347rwkw and the final tune of about 340rwkw/22psi and 317rwkw/18psi. As you can see the smaller exhaust housings weren't too good at higher boost levels, with your larger exhaust housings I would of expected a bit more power, maybe it's worth your time to look into some cam gears or even better some larger camshafts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
    • I got a hand held bisssel one and it's a piece of shit. Doesn't work for more than about 5 seconds. So much so that I nearly refuse to believe any wet dry vac actually works or has enough suction to clean the carpet of a car. I'm discouraged as all the good ones are $300+ for an unknown result. I saw MCM did a Ryobi video where they use this thing: https://www.ryobi.com.au/products/stick-vacuum-cleaners/18v-one-hptm-brushless-spot-cleaner-tool-only Anyone have any experience actually using a tool like this when not paid to showcase it?
×
×
  • Create New...