Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Adam - that's nice average power.

When my R33 was stock I get 145 rwkw with just a zorst & pod.

So 162 with auto is pretty good, I'd say. What is the boost set to ?

What does the seat of your pants say ?? Can you feel the difference ??

Meggala,Yeah I am. I can feel that flat spot but I haven't had a chance to drive it properly yet since the AVC-R went in on friday. Makes me wonder about all these guys with 200 and 250 rwkw though.

Obviously I know that I have an auto and there are power losses there but that was my choice for comfort in Sh!tney traffic.

Here are my first dyno sheets.  Car is an R34 GTT auto with full exhaust and AVC-R boost controller.

 

What do people think?  Is this alright?

looks good adam. with the tiptronic gearbox i think you should be reading slightly higher than manuals because of gear ratios. and i also believe auto/tiptronics have a different ecu....but dont quote me on that :P from memory (i'll have to dig it up) i got 154kw on the same dyno with about the same amount of mods.

1 tip - FMIC. i didnt notice any seat of the pants difference and thus that represented zero bang for dollar!!! for a street car, i think the side mount is perfect for power levels close to 200rwkw. when you do some trackwork or get a bigger turbo then i think this is where a FMIC starts to get important.

spend your money on a handling pack from say whiteline. what are you after? track stuff? street?

3rd gear for me and 4th for you is 1:1 but I'm not sure if this takes into account the diff or not.

I do like the track which is why I thought about getting the FMIC. I'm also leaning towards whiteline for suspension.

I've got to get some decent tyres too.

Robo: Yeah they certainly seemed to wring it's neck on the dyno didn't they. I went to 7k last night when I miss pressed the button to change into 2nd gear. It didn't seem to hit any rev limiter.

Franks: I was going from memory but I think it touched that mark once at Eastern Creek. The rest of the time it stay a little under that even after 15 minutes on the track. It behaves so well. Brakes never fade, never overheats, once got at A/T light to go on but that was at the end of a track session with the last two laps basically being drift laps at Wakefield the other day.

Benm: seems it took 5.5 hours :)

I had a proper drive last night and that flat spot is quite annoying but the rest of it... mmmm... power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...