Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Joyous really starting to twist my arm haha.

6boob with gtx3071/76.I hate lag and want to start doing the more track days really. I'll have to just work out what I want. I'll try e85 and the hks 2535 just to how it goes I think. I don't think there would be much point in running e ex gate on the 2535. I'd be wiser to sell it as is an upgrade I think.

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You have all the hardware to make sweet loving with that car :)

If you're scared of the lag, look at Hypergear's stuff.. it's got a few great turbos for response. The 2535 is a great turbo, but these days it starting to show it's age in terms of performance.

GTX3071R in .63 internally gate would be something that might fit your needs!

Could smash more boost in the midrange, set up the boost controller so that it peaks 4-5psi higher in the midrange and then tapers down to whatever boost you are currently running at redline. The airflow required at redline at say 15psi would be similar to the airflow required at ~20psi at 4000rpm.

If you look at the compressor map and run along the edge of the flow line you can often find on these smaller turbos you can run a lot more boost in the midrange than redline getting the absolute most out of the turbo across the board, would make for massive midrange punch but similar top end power like has been stated.

Something to remember is 18psi doesn't always = 18psi etc, at lower rpm 18psi is flowing far less air than 18psi at high rpm.

Edited by Rolls

This should be very close to what a 2535 would preform on a Rb25det (my turbine wheel is one trim larger). Its bit small for the Rb25det motor but good for a Rb20det.

279rwkws = E85, 243rwkws = P98

power.JPG

So stao what specs is that turbo you put up? Same wheels as a 2535 but larger trim.? Originally I thought 270rwkw would be possible on e85 but the more I think about what r31nismoid said the more I think it will run out up top as the -7 and -9s do on e85. Plus the rear housing is a tiny .64. Wonder how a 2535 would have gone if they made a slightly larger ar rear housing.??? Does anyone think it would be worth putting a billet wheel in. Would it make any difference.

Stao that turbo looks pretty wicked for the street. Making 200rwkw by 4000rpm which is always a pretty quick car for the street I believe and 500nm of torque in the top. Make it a hard punching rb25 and probably a lot of wheel spin haha.

I prefer not to hijack this thread, But I do have some results with the .86 rear that I would like to show, my reply is in my high flow thread.

http://www.skylinesa...ost__p__6753492

It sounds like most of the GT28 based turbos are going to run out of puff in the 270 - 280 RWKw area and to do better means going up in turbine and housing size - as in beyond GT28 sized anything .

Garretts changeover point from GT28 to GT30 turbines was with the GT2871R t0 GT3071R and its same deal with the newer GTX2867R and GT3067R .

Us RB people are a bit limited in what T3 flanged turbine housings we can use so beyond HKS and OP6 ones (GT28 basiically) your limited to T3/T31 or GT30 ones .

I'd like to know more about power vs turbine response with the GTX3067R and GTX3071R and what can be achieved with Garretts GT30 0.63 AR IW housing in each case .

Its probably worth noting that the GTX3067R uses a T04B comp housing and can probably be a bit more stealthy than the GTX3071R which uses a T04E housing , and would possibly need spacing out like you do with a GT3076R which is same dimensionally .

So where does that leave you with a HKS GT2535 ? You could retain your T3 flanged HKS turbine housing and fit a GTX2867R into it - or opt for one of the modestly sized GTX30R turbos for a bit more . Depends what power you're chasing and how much you can afford to spend . Staos turbos would be cheaper and probably easier to fit .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

It's been mentioned in this thread before but putting a decent manifold on with an external gate is not a bad option. I've just done that with my HKS GT-RS and result has been incredible.

I used a MX Performance exhaust manifold (with 1" runners) and Turbosmart Compgate. We welded the stock internal gate shut.

The 1" runners keeps the gas speed high low in the rev range, so performance on the street is awesome - everyone one who drives it says it's the best Skyline they have driven on the street, as the throttle response is so immediate... It builds positive boost from 1200 rpm, with 5 psi at 2000 rpm and it now makes more power at 14psi of boost than it used to at 18psi. Here's a comparison of the difference of power delivery at the same boost level with the manifold/wastegate change.

IMG_0458_zps6f39d62f.jpg

Given the 2535 is quite similar to the GT-RS, I think you'd hit the power level you're after quite easily with E85 and this manifold setup.

So ryno do you have any pictures of your setup you can post up?

So discopotato03 what would be your choice if aiming for what I am. I'm open for any suggestions. And I do wonder how the hks 2535 housings would go with bigger gtx wheels inside. But for the money I'd probably be better off to go a gtx3067r/3071r. I really want around 270rwkw and any more would be a bonus. I just really want it to be a response monster. As I plan to do a lot more track days and I believe a responsive 270+rwkw is perfect for the street track on e85.

Well Scott at Insight tuned mine and got 271 from my GTRS setup . He also said that turbo seems soooo small but hey it did the numbers .

A GT2535 is the same as a GTRS on the hot side but the compressor is a 71mm one in 52 trim where yours is I think 68ish mm in 56 trim . Also the GTRSs compressor housing is port shrouded so they don't surge with the boot in at low/med engine revs .

You should probabvbly do some searches on the Garrett GTX2867R because they also fit in our HKS turbine housings .The $64 question remains , is it the turbine or compressor side thats holding the power show up - or possibly both sides .

The $128 question is how well does that GTX3067R work in the real world ? I'm reluctant to go beyond the 3067R to the GTX3071R because I don't want 500 Hp or the turbine lag that goes with it .

I'm thinking real hard about that GT3067R and if I went ahead my GTRS would be up for grabs .

A .

Well on paper the new gtx3067r seems like it could a really good thing for us rb25 owners who want a bolt on to standard manifold turbo. And with the to4b surge slotted front housing it should not need the likes of any spacers I'm led to believe? Did your gtrs make the 270rwkw on 98 or e85.? maybe it would be worth me buying a gtx2867r and using the hks .64 housing. Do you know of anyone ever using the Garrett .86 t28 housing with a adaptor plate? Disco I think you should upgrade to the gtx3067r and be the guinie pig for all us rb25 owners.

Hey Josh,

There are more pictures in my build thread below...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/409509-rynos-r32-over-a-decade-and-counting/

Given you want a "response monster" - you'd wet yourself if you drove my car. I wouldn't ditch your 2535 just yet, the MX manifold may be the transformation you're after.

No I don't know of any adapted T25 flanged 0.86 housings . Some have said that it didn't it didn't always pay of but those were probably on inline 4s so hard to make an inline six judgement .

Yeah well these GTX turbos are exy and I'd like to see more results before I make the jump .

A .

Ryno that is one heck of a ride you have got there. I love the way you have done everything. The torque your car puts out with such a baby turbo is almost unbelievable. That is pretty much exactly what I'm after. Have you ever thought about running e85 or water/meth injection? I wish you were closer to wangaratta Victoria to take me for a wrap. Very impressive build I must say. So who made the dump ect? How much was the manifold ect? I don't think I've ever seen a mx manifold.

I think they have the potential to be good things provided as always you don't get too hungry size wise . Map wise you sort of need to go down a wheel size with them compared to the GT series ie from GT3076R to GTX3071R - and in theory GT3071R to GTX3067R .

Recently I was looking at overlayed maps of these examples and generally the one down size GTX wheels appear to be wider ranging ones but they seem to make their power gains from higher pressure ratios - boost .

You would think that a machined forging would be stronger lighter and a better overall shape than a casting but they chaged things like OD blade count and trim size as well . Think they have extended tips too .

The greatest advantage of a machined wheel is that you can make mild to wild changes and its as simple as changing the CNC programming .

Anyway the Xs will be cheaper OS and if you already have a turbine housing cheaper again .

Anyone selling a GT30 IW big gate one ?

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...