Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't think i'm invited, rb20 with stage 2 gcg highflow. It brings new meaning to the term laggy :D

boost curve is something like:  

2000rpm    0psi

2500rpm    0psi

3000rpm    1psi

3500rpm    3psi

4000rpm    6psi

4200rpm    12psi :)  

i only run 12psi atm until the new injectors go in next month and the car gets a tune

makes 173rwkw atm

Is this the 450hp r33 GCG turbo rebuild on an rb20??

As im looking at doin this myself, but thats abit friggen laggy...

Do you have 3' or 2.5' intercooler piping? 3' Dump? Is it split? Just a few things that have some say on lag...

Is this the 450hp r33 GCG turbo rebuild on an rb20??

As im looking at doin this myself, but thats abit friggen laggy...

Do you have 3' or 2.5' intercooler piping? 3' Dump? Is it split? Just a few things that have some say on lag...

It's the old style stage 2 highflow (rated around 480hp when they were still sold)

It will be a bit laggier than the current highflows that are sold by GCG which are pretty much the original stage 1 highflows (450 hp)

It wasn't as bad as it looks, in the end i just got used to driving above 4k when i wanted to go fast and it used to come on boost hard and spin up the wheels from 4500 to redline easily in second. Trouble was on the 1st-2nd change it would drop back below the boost threshold so you couldn't keep it going through 1st and second.

Injectors went in and shortly after that the car developed a mystery missfire and the engine started to get a bit tired (probably form being driven over 4k all the time). I wound up the boost to 15psi at the end as i didn't really care if i popped the engine and it went even quicker, regularly breaking traction in third. Seat of the pants it was making a fair bit more than the 173.

In the end i chucked an rb25 in the car. Running the same turbo and a manifold with a piss weak home tune it made a very easy 200rwkw on 14psi. A/f in the 11s. Still a bit slow to come on boost though.

I'd also love to see some sort of decent comparison between the hi-flow and the GT-RS. Having heard many differing opinions on both turbos (mostly from partially biased owners trying to justify the $$$ spent), it would be nice to have a more concrete set of performance results to compare from both turbos on the same set up.

This info would be particularly helpful as I'm also in the process of deciding whether spending the extra dollars on the GT-RS is worth it for me...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...