Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just want to get some facts straight.

The r31 skyline is pretty much the pintara, which hade a L20b engine. Nissan australia based the pintara and skyline on the japanese version. The skyline is basically the same car as the pintara exept an rb30de and different tail lights and frount styling (in the 3 series). The japanese version had the turbo rb30det and similar tail lights to the aussie one, but with the no plastic covers, and projector headlights. the japanese only had the gts1 and gts2.

correct me if im wrong.

oh, and does the local r31 have 4 or 5 stud rotors?

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/
Share on other sites

Japanese GTS-x r31 skylines had Rb20DET engines, there is no factory car that has an RB30DET engine. The only turbo RB30 is the engine in the VL Commodore turbo which was a RB30ET.

The GTS1 and GTS2 are australian.

Local R31 have 4 studs, i think that turbo jap R31 have 5 studs. Jap r31 coupes and the 4 door passage have pillarless doors.

Go to www.r31skylineclub.com , you will probably get a better response over there than here if ur talking about r31s.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-860441
Share on other sites

The Pintara had a CA20E, and it (the car) was based on the aussie skyline, the only differences are: Grille/no driving lights, no centre garnish between rear taillights on sedans, aswell as the engine, gearbox and Diff (4.11 25spline instead of 3.7 or 3.889 28spline with some LSD) Interior is exactly the same.

I thought Imports had 4studs? I know of at least one that has 4 stud, maybe they were easier to convert to 5 stud so most have been changed? dunno.

Jap had GTS 2door and 4door, GTS-X 2door, GTS-R 2door, PassageGT 4door, plus a load of cooking model non-turbo rb20s that we dont see much of here (cos their shit).

Aus had Exec, GX, GXE, Silhouette, Ti and Silhouette GTS

All had RB30E's, GTS1 (white) had 130kw and GTS2 had 140kw.

also, the aussie cars had live axle diffs, and are prone to whining, and are pretty crappy considering the imports hav R180s and R200s.

...also, R31skylineclub is good :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-860864
Share on other sites

Everything you could possibly want to know about the R31 Skyline and R31 Pintara, models, series, series differences, body styling/types, factory colours, motor types, body parts etc etc etc can be found in this thread: R31 series

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-861043
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

here's a quote from a book called "australian cars" i found-

"Nissan also wanted to be in on the act* , especially since it was supplying the engines and transmisions for the commodore. Its solution was to the problem of building a family car was to take its four cylider medium sized pintara, fit it with a six cylinder engine, rename the car skyline, and market it as a larger car. this seemed to have worked, as........"

My point is that the pintara was based on the JDM skyline, and the aussie r31 was based on the pintara. Is this right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-873966
Share on other sites

here's a quote from a book called "australian cars" i found-

"Nissan also wanted to be in on the act* , especially since it was supplying the engines and transmisions for the commodore. Its solution was to the problem of building a family car was to take its four cylider medium sized pintara, fit it with a six cylinder engine, rename the car skyline, and market it as a larger car. this seemed to have worked, as........"

My point is that the pintara was based on the JDM skyline, and the aussie r31 was based on the pintara. Is this right?

*= earlier before this statement, the book was saying about how there was a battle between holden, ford and mistubishi.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-873969
Share on other sites

hmm interesting

nissan would have decided on making a 6cyl skyline long before it sold the engine to holden

so that bits wrong

as for pintara being the basis for oz skyline..well i guess its true in some ways and wrong in others, it had the styling of the 1985 japanese skyline, without its pillarless design, so i guess it was a bit of both pintara and skyline.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-874226
Share on other sites

also to answer some questions from your first post

only the 1985,86 and very early 87 had "uncovered" tail lights, the rest had series3 oz style lights. The difference is not just the smoked plastic cover, the lenses and reflectors are quite different to each other. Similarly, not all import r31s had projector headlights, the 85 series2 style obviously did not, and the 1986 cars also missed out, having standard headlights, like those on australian s3 r31s.

gtr69 - as far as i know all imports had r200

just for your own interest racsov500.... my own car is a 1986 gts coupe, with updated projector headlights and original gts uncovered tail lights (black as opposed to passage grey). It also has the updated front grille, with GTS monogrammed into the left hand side. The 1986 versions had a central GTS badge. These cars came with the NICS rb20det, which i binned for a r32 rb20det silvertop.

i hope u succeed in owning your own r31 in the next few years

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-874232
Share on other sites

Here's something interesting that just hit me, has anyone seen a japanese r31 without the series 3 healights/guards? Can't say I have.

Could the s1 & 2 fronts be australian only?

I'm looking to do a diff converion to my s3 wagon. Some skyline sedans had a h195 live rear end. Don't hear about them much though.

To save you the reply, I know the springs mount differntly on the wagons, just haven't had a good look at a h195 to see if it will be doable yet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42032-r31-skyline/#findComment-874912
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...