Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

Looking at purchasing DBA 4000 rotors + Nismo R Tune pads for my R34 GTR.

Searching for feedback as to thoughts regarding this combination.

Are the R-Tune pads noisy? I'm attempting to avoid noise / squealing.

I've done some googling and getting mixed reviews about the noise.

Saw a trader on here has the pads at a great price so currently an attractive option for me.

Thanks.

Not a big help to you but the DBA4000 are an amazing rotor! Combined with the A1RM they squeal! Combined with the HPX they dont and still stop well (Both are QFM, hence not a major help)

Anyway, rotors get thumbs up, pads i have NFI :D

DBA 4000 Rotors are good for all round street and light track use.

From memory Nismo R-Tune pads are designed for high speed circuit driving.

So not really a street performance pad as you would never generate enough heat to warm up the pads.

Hence you'd might get some squealing...

Unless you are doing track work, then get them.

My A1RM 's don't squeal on my dba4000 rotors....

I find they squeal more on non slotted rotors, but they do squeal from time to time on DBA4000s too when a touch cold.

I find they squeal more on non slotted rotors, but they do squeal from time to time on DBA4000s too when a touch cold.

Thanks for the replies guys.

Johnnilicte, are you referring to R-Tune pads squealing?

Cheers.

sorry, I was referring to QFM A1RM pads as quoted :)

Are you planning to use these on the street? If so I HIGHLY DO NOT RECOMMEND IT

"Allowable temperature range(proper rotor temperature): 200C~800C."

find a pad that has a lower operating temp, I do recall Project Mu have pads that are between 0~700 degrees... (I'm assuming you're not planning to use local QFM pads lol)

Thanks mate, had Project Mu B-Spec on my old Evo.

Another option I was considering however trying to avoid is Bendix ultimates.

From previous experiences, dusting appears to be more than others.

QFM > Bendix

Bendix pads are horrid, for nearly double the price of QFM you'll think they would perform better.. They squeal, they eat rotors, they make loads of dust.

I'm a firm supporter of QFM, I've used (on a street car) Bendix Ultimates, Project Mu, EBC and QFM. For the money and performance you can't go wrong with QFM.

Thanks mate, had Project Mu B-Spec on my old Evo.

Another option I was considering however trying to avoid is Bendix ultimates.

From previous experiences, dusting appears to be more than others.

I got Project Mu B Specs in at the moment.

Great pads!

Why waste money on DBA when RDA is just as good? I know plenty of guys who have cracked there 4000's.

QFM A1RM's are good but can be noisy, I'm running TRW at the moment but they are also pretty noisy.

DBA's don't crack, people just didn't put enough heat cycles through them.

DBA also have a new design now.

Cheers guys.

DBA old wiper slot design was prone to cracking apparently, which is a shame because it was so sexy.

RDA hats and edges are unpainted so they rust and i'm anal - I actually have them on my S15 at the moment. Get what you pay for I guess.

Not really a fan of the new RDA black / dark edition ones either (cant remember exaftly what they are called).

Unless you have an upgrade brake package (356mm etc) - RDA FTW. Cheaper and same performance I found over the years.

Any rotor will get rust appearing if you don't drive/use the car regularly.

Also most performance pads that actually stop a car, will give you dust. I know my Ferrodo DS2500 & DS3000's put a good amount of dust in just a couple days of driving, but the car stopped hard every time so I wasn't fussed

I also drive my car to work everyday with qfm a1rm pads and they work fine for daily driving

You can definitely tell the difference when they are propely warmed up against normal driving but there is absolutely no problem with using them normally

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...