Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so i don't know how to explain this properly, but I've had my car for over a year(R33 GTS-T.) Just recently i've put an aftermarket exhaust on. lately I've been noticing a problem, or i think it is anyways. when i accelerate the turbo gauge wont go any higher than the line before the +7 and it feels like something is stopping it from going further. is it because I've installed a new exhaust so i need a tune up? any help would be great! I've got a picture of the turbo gauge to make this explanation abit easier to understand haha. Thanks:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/
Share on other sites

That's waste gate pressure bro. Got a boost controller? If so its farked. Or when the exhaust was done a vacuum line for the boost controller was cut or squashed or something. Or your boost controller is turned off..... lol

Edit: waste gate pressure is how much the turbos run stock...

Edited by Anfanee
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773061
Share on other sites

That's waste gate pressure bro. Got a boost controller? If so its farked.

Edit: waste gate pressure is how much the turbos run stock...

Ok, cheers man. btw that picture isn't of my actual dash

and nah man i don't have a boost controller, the car is all stock apart from the exhaust.

Edited by MC-WOSHY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773070
Share on other sites

Sometimes they vary slightly. I think my GTR when i ran stock whilst running the turbos in where running just under... If you got a boost controller you can wind it up a bit more safely and get a bit more power. You might gain about 20kw but meh TBH it isn't worth the issues it can sometimes cause. Ive now got rid of the original turbos and re done the whole engine. You are probably noticing a difference from before because the turbo might be a bit more responsive so it feels like it's got more to give but really it doesn't have that much more in it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773092
Share on other sites

Sometimes they vary slightly. I think my GTR when i ran stock whilst running the turbos in where running just under... If you got a boost controller you can wind it up a bit more safely and get a bit more power. You might gain about 20kw but meh TBH it isn't worth the issues it can sometimes cause. Ive now got rid of the original turbos and re done the whole engine. You are probably noticing a difference from before because the turbo might be a bit more responsive so it feels like it's got more to give but really it doesn't have that much more in it.

Ahhh i see. thanks so much for your help man:) yeah this is my first car, i bought it stock so i could do it up. slowly doing bit by bit, I'll get there some day haha.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773102
Share on other sites

Ahhh i see. thanks so much for your help man:) yeah this is my first car, i bought it stock so i could do it up. slowly doing bit by bit, I'll get there some day haha.

Good plan. I didn't have much of a choice. Melted piston rings to pistons, Cracked the pistons and broke the valves. Had to do a complete head and bottom end rebuild. So went all out haha. Just make sure when you do start going for more power you research properly. You see so many people that bolt a bigger turbo on and blow up their engine or put a bigger turbo on and the whole car is limited by something else. For example: my car is currently at 260RWKW limited by the stock AFM. When i get around to replacing the AFM ill go up to around 330kw+ a few other little things ill see 350-360.

It's all part of the fun!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773114
Share on other sites

Good plan. I didn't have much of a choice. Melted piston rings to pistons, Cracked the pistons and broke the valves. Had to do a complete head and bottom end rebuild. So went all out haha. Just make sure when you do start going for more power you research properly. You see so many people that bolt a bigger turbo on and blow up their engine or put a bigger turbo on and the whole car is limited by something else. For example: my car is currently at 260RWKW limited by the stock AFM. When i get around to replacing the AFM ill go up to around 330kw+ a few other little things ill see 350-360.

It's all part of the fun!

Oh that must've sucked! sounds like you did a good job tho:) yeah i will do research before hand. Not particularly keen on blowing up my car otheriwse ill be stuffed haha. im putting a fmic on next:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421085-turbo-issue/#findComment-6773128
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...