Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

On my R33 GTS-T, I recently ran an ECU diagnostics and it came up code 34 or knock sensor. Could this possibly explain why I have some good drives and some not so good drives power wise? How much of a difference in ignition timing does the knock sensor play part to? Ie, if my knock sensor is faulting and sending unusally high levels of knock (which aren't actually happening) to the ECU, could my ECU be pulling lots of timing out and causing my car to run like a dog?

It's very intermittant though, some drives, it'll have a great run with full power and all the usual acceleration, speed and lack of traction it should have, other times (exactly the same conditions), it will feel like it's loading up, boost will increase, but the car will be stagnant and not accelerate. Is this all the doing of a faulty knock sensor?

Any light you could shed would be appreciated. In the meantime, i'm getting a new knock sensor anyway.

Cheers!

P.S. I know the car isn't pinging, it's been tuned well and is making good power but not consistently as stated above.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42217-faulty-knock-sensor-causing-problems/
Share on other sites

yeah basically when the knock sensor throws a code to the ecu it will retard the timing alot. thats why when you hit like 5 grand it feels like you hit a wall. i had the problem for about 5months and didn't know what it was... found out and checked the sensors and one was disconnected. been great ever since.

Code 34 means that the knock sensor is disconnected or shorting. It does not indicate that the ECU has detected "knock" and retarded timing to compensate.

If it's intermittent performance, then it could be a break in the wire somewhere that makes the connection most of the time, but some condition causes it to lose the connection.

ur afm is maxing out. there is so much ariflow that the stock ecu pulls timing out, hence why u feel the car is making good power sometimes and shit power other. This happened to my car and whatsisnames car when we installed a unichip and wer makin around 210-220rwkws.

Solution is to buy a standalone ecu like powerfc as the standard ecu seems to be pulling alot of timing.

thanks for the replies. I thought it made sense that my knock sensor fault would cause timing to be removed. I've gotta get it up on ramps to check all connections now i guess.

Everyone tells me PowerFC and ultimately i want (need) one but i'd rather pay $2K off my loan than on one at the moment if it can be helped.

Thanks for all the replies

Sure enuf, put it on a hoist (just easier) and there was my front knock sensor hanging loose (not off, just loose). Have plugged it back in, made sure it's totally secure and BOOM, power all over the place again :D Tried another ECU diagnotic and got a code 55 - all clear :)

Car is pulling violently all the way to redline again, breaking traction all over the place and generally being great fun to drive. :burnout:

If it's this good with S-AFC + Stock ECU, can't wait to get PowerFC or Wolf and see what happens.

My advice: Do not underestimate your knock sensors and the simply ECU diagnostics...gives a great insight into what could be wrong before resorting to a mechanic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...