Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys long time reader first time poster

:whistling: noob

anyway i took a m35 stagea for a test drive today and it felt slow. it felt slower than my sigma

ive never driven one before so im looking to jump in someones car(with them) for 5min or so

anyone south of the city would be awsome i will drive to them

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423864-help-buyn-m35-in-sa/
Share on other sites

Slow?

1st time I drove one I was impressed.

You sit pretty high in a stagea.. This would make it seem slower then it is.

That's odd.

Seriously slower then your sigma?

If that's the case, walk away. Look at another car.

yeah it felt slower(sigmas 130kw atw)but u do sit low

in D rolling 10km/h, then flat to the floor and it didnt pull me hard into my seat like all the other turbos ive owned

the fuel light was on, does it go into eco/limp mode

i really need a ride in another to compare, it could be im just use to shitty cars that are either on or off with power and it is fast

Stockies are not all that quick, infact, a stock turbo M35 would be around the 130awkw with a much heavier car that a sigma. However this can be upgraded. Simple mods will net good gains, and wake it up. The stock turbo is fragile and will run out of puff at 200rwkw tuned.

The M35 will drive rings around a sigma with some power and suspension mods. But at the end of the day, it's a big ass wagon, Not a sports car. Buy a sports car if you want one, and a wagon if you need a wagon.

It's 204kw at the fly factory, attessa system is full time RWD with torque split as necessary.

RWD only loose 15 - 20% through the drive train, so that's a max loss of 40kw, which makes around 160rwkw

And in 70/30 split its about 30% loss which is 140kw at all 4.

You have to remember this.

Your sigma, silvia, corolla, datsun, etc are all around 1.0 - 1.2 T.. With the same if not

More power at the treads...The M35 is 1.6 - 1.7 T

That's an extra 0.5 T of weight is has to move.

You can't compare cars like that.

In the end it's a family wagon... It will beat an SS commo wagon...

BUT - the M35 has alot of unlocked potential.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...