Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Today i changed the front and rear brake pads on my r34 gtt.

However i forgot to bleed the brake lines, i was in a rush and drove off after all pads were on. Is this a bad thing?

I drove the car for about an hour today and it seems fine. Popped the hood when i got home and there was a bit of fluid that must of overflowed out of the tank, im guessing this is from when the pistons were pushed in?

Also when i first started the car i gently pumped the brake a few times and heard some air then brake pedal went normal again.

Can someone please give me some advice here.

Greatly appreciated. Also searched a few tutorials and didnt mention anything about bleeding the brakes only showed pics on how to change pads.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423870-changed-brake-pads-need-help/
Share on other sites

There are endless howtos on bleeding brakes on the net.

Bleeding is not essential, because, if you think about it, you haven't opened up the hydraulic system at all. BUT......you have disturbed it and as you discovered it did take some pumps to get it settled down again. Because brakes are the single most important part of your car, bar none, you shouldn't mess about. Make the effort to get them bled up.

More than just bleeding, if you cannot remember the last time the fluid was changed, then it is certainly time to flush it through so you have fresh stuff from one end of the system to the other. This alone is a good reason why you should bleed/flush the brakes when you change pads. It is a good time to make sure that it is all good at the same time.

The other thing you need to remember is to suck some fluid out of the master cylinder reservoir BEFORE you push any pads back. Now that you have brake fluid all down the firewall and haven't washed it of with water, it's probably too late to rinse it of so it doesn't eat the paint.

  • Like 1

There are endless howtos on bleeding brakes on the net.

Bleeding is not essential, because, if you think about it, you haven't opened up the hydraulic system at all. BUT......you have disturbed it and as you discovered it did take some pumps to get it settled down again. Because brakes are the single most important part of your car, bar none, you shouldn't mess about. Make the effort to get them bled up.

More than just bleeding, if you cannot remember the last time the fluid was changed, then it is certainly time to flush it through so you have fresh stuff from one end of the system to the other. This alone is a good reason why you should bleed/flush the brakes when you change pads. It is a good time to make sure that it is all good at the same time.

The other thing you need to remember is to suck some fluid out of the master cylinder reservoir BEFORE you push any pads back. Now that you have brake fluid all down the firewall and haven't washed it of with water, it's probably too late to rinse it of so it doesn't eat the paint.

great post.

Thank you for the advice.

Luckily the brake fluid did not go on any paint it only oozed out of the tank a little didnt really go onto anything else.

How exactly do i bleed the lines of air? I want to do it just to be safe. Do the lines have to be bled on each actual brake or can you do it from the engine bay? Cant actually see any nipple/valve.

The fluid was flushed during 100k service (4,000ks ago) so wouldnt really be due for a flush.

If you haven't bled brakes before, it is most certainly worth enlisting the help of someone who does know what they're doing to show you how. it's not really a 1 person job anyway, so you might as well learn to do it properly instead of reading about it, f**king it up, then needing help anyway. :D

Should be right if you just pushed the pistons back in. Unless it ran out of fluid when you were pumping the pistons back out.

If the fluid level was still O.K after the pistons were pushed back out then just top it up and it will be fine. Get some water and wash the brake fluid, should only need water

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...