Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello skyliners

just a quick question for now

i got myself a nicely rebuilt forged gtr this weekend gone

it has a power fc big single turbo 700cc injectors running 17psi and plan to up it to 20 or 25 psi but has stock air flow meters

i got told to go to z32 or r33 air flow meters but i was thinking would a map sensor be better ???

**can the power fc support a map sensor with another tune??

**would a map sensor be more recommended over bigger air flow meters??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423946-power-fc-and-map-sensor/
Share on other sites

That's why you would have a d detro just to run a map. You get the power fc to run a maf. But get a vipec or autronic (whatever it's called) if you getting another computer to run map. Much better ecu

you can't run map sensors on the l-jetro powerfc (the airflow meter version)

youd have to sell it and buy the d-jetro version and buy the map sensors and get it tuned

you shouldnt max twin z32s and its probably comparable to cost vs selling your current setup and buying a map sensor based system

Go adaptronic/vipec/link ect. Map sensor capable and a better ecu also can run dual maps for e85 and 98. Although nothing wrong with a PFC and twin z32s. You'll be doing pretty well to max twin z32s out.

Cheers Josh

just go map, everything works so much better and you can clean up your pipe work. i have had so many issues because of a maf setup that would be prevented with a map. plus if you get a map it will be with a better ecu.

Forget the FC and go a real ECU. Link, Vipec, Blackbox.

For the money you're going to spend on installation with the Power FC WITH the MAP sensors, you're much better off with another option. HOMEWORK!

ViPec and I assume Link plug ins work well and can used with either either MAFs or MAP . Goes in you std ECUs case so looks factory at a glance . I already had a Tech Edge wide band to do the oxygen sensing stuff but the V88 has all that std if you only want one box .

IMO you need WB 02 input and the ECU the ability to trim mixtures set by an AFR target table - for road anyway .

I'm far from being a good tuner but I fiddled all my start light load and cruise settings and I'm getting around (in Sydney) 13-14/100 on E70 . My 25 now uses MAP after having a PFC and Z32 and while I did get a bit better consumption with my tuning towards the end with the Apexi I wouldn't go back . I'm still learning with Vipec and MAP sensing and its slowly getting better and with modern injectors like IDs should be better again .

Be choosy with larger injectors because the best motorsport computer on the planet can't improve old tech injector abilities at really low pulse widths .

My computer reckons I'm idling at 1% injector duty cycle and its not too bad but could be a little smoother .

If I was you I'd get modern injectors first and change them over when the next computer is fitted and tuned .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...