Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ladies & Gentlemen, Boys & Girls the time has come to run our next installment in the SAU-QLD Drag Day @ Willowbank Raceway on 29/06/2013.

Date: 29/06/2013

Location: WILLOWBANK RACEWAY

Time: 2-4pm

Cost: $55 Paid SauQLD member

$65 Non Paid SauQLD member

To run you will need:

Requirements for Car

Helmet to Standard

Long Sleeve Shirt

Long Pants

Covered Shoes

Requirements for MotorBike

Helmet to Standard

Leather Jacket

Long Pants

Boots & Gloves

Cars cannot run quicker than 11 sec

Bikes cannot run quicker than 10 sec

To run quicker you will need a current ANDRA Licence

All helmets need to be less than 12 years old from Date of Manufacture AND meet one of the following Standards:
SNELL SA2000
SNELL SA2005
SNELL 2000 / 2005
SNELL M2000
SNELL M2005
BS 6658-1985
SFI 41.2A
SFI 31.2A
AS/NZ 1698:2006

is the current requirements..

also alot of people think the helemts with "AS 1698" is the same as "AS/NZ 1698:2006" and its not,
their two different classifications.

13 January 2009 - The helmet regulations have changed, any ANDRA licenced holder is to abide by the
current ANDRA rule book at any event. At Test'n'Tunes and Street Series events we will be
allowing street vehicles (i.e - non ANDRA licence holders) to still use the AS1698 standard helmet.

Click this link for important new Safety Requirements to run at this event: http://www.willowbankraceway.com.au/pages/?ParentPageID=259&PageID=259

Payment Details:

Name: Skylines Australia Queensland Club

Bank: Westpac

BSB: 034 063

ACC: 354012

PAYMENT REFERENCE: Username&DragDay

Please do not send cash in the Mail

Spectator Cost: $20Adults, $18 Student with ID & Kids under 13 Free

All are welcome to stay on after the QLD Event finishes & watch evening Test'N'Tune free

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/424881-sauqld-drag-day-29062013/
Share on other sites

hell'ov'a'fun'day

I needed to read that three times and it made my head hurt... damn you Broncos making me go out drinking last night...

Todd I reckon these are the best events and im sure you'll get a big crowd again, if im in town ill be there on 2 wheels.

  • Like 1

I'm confused.... so I can use a helmet that meets AS 1698?

What is the difference with this and AS/NZ 1698:2006? I have googled but can't find info on what the difference is.

Thanks guys - I'm also very keen!

I'm confused.... so I can use a helmet that meets AS 1698?

What is the difference with this and AS/NZ 1698:2006? I have googled but can't find info on what the difference is.

Thanks guys - I'm also very keen!

I believe an amendment made to the 1698/1988 Standard in 2006, New regulations for the sale of helmets needing to comply with current ANDRA ratings.

If its labelled with a silver Australian Compliance AS1698 you will comply. If not, then you will not be able to compete until you get one

clicky clicky http://roadrider.com.au/special-features/what-makes-a-helmet-legal

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...