Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , have had a few minor dramas setting up cam switching with a ViPec plug in . Is the best way to make up a table of MAP vs revs and run with the solenoid switched off up to say 3000 revs and 100 kpa (atmo) pressure ? Mine had been using a TPS vs revs table and that created drivability problems .

I set up a MAP/revs table which is off up to about 1600 revs and the off/on divide is sort of a diagonal line from 120 kpa at 1600 revs to around 0 kpa at 4000 revs . Its not really linear more a curve with its radius facing the lower RHS of the table if that makes sense .

Referencing off TP cost lots of off boost torque and fingers crossed I'll get better fuel consumption if not booted everywhere .

It's surprising how wild 256 Tomeis get with the solenoid on at very low revs , no hope of idling anyway .

Also it's set to switch off at all pressures between 4690 and 4700 revs .

Sorry if a silly question but I migrated from a PFC and you had no choices in this area , you did the idle learn and hoped it sorted itself out . Hopefully this is where I get the consumption back I had with the Apexi .

Realy like the versatility of the ViPec but it's a learning curve , cheers Adrian .

Easiest way is off a GP output then put your desired parameters (Rpm>1100, tps> 5% or whatever)

I forget which digital output it is but it is shown in the help section somewhere (in the wiring section)

Hope this makes sense. Im going from memory.

its AUX 1, set it to gp output.

Condition 1 and 2 - (OR 3)

SC 1: rpm> 1400

SC 2 rpm< 4000

SC 3 map< 180

start with this and then fine tune it to how you like it.

basically this is setup so its off on idle, then at 1400rpm to 4000rpm it will be on until the map goes over 180kpa where it will switch it off.

hope this helps

This is what I'm using and it seems to work quite well . It feels much better at part throttle for most of the sub atmo 2-3000 rev area and the 4 across the middle of the top row is an attemp to lose the closed throttle kick/buck I'm get in this area when cold . I think the cam switching and throttle closed fuel cut resumption were fighting each other in the 1400-1600 rev area .

I guess it makes sense to get the best trapping efficiency (shortest overlap period) at light loads and aside from a bit more torque in this area I could use better fuel consumption numbers too . My consumption yardstick is how far I get before the needle drops to the top line from full to the neck - which is real scientific is't it . Better than 50 is reasonable and better than 100 by the first 1/4 has been hard in the past .

A .

post-9594-0-02228600-1369920002_thumb.png

Edited by discopotato03

Can you post a video of how wild the tomei 256's sound disco? I have a vipec plugin myself. Can you go into a little more detail on what your actualy setting up doing.? I'm very new to all these awesome vipec capabilities lol.

My tuner did it while I was with him once , its really only around idle up to dunno maybe 13-1400 revs . Best comparison I can give is trying to make a engine with full race cams idle too slow . Wild shaking and constant stalling . You wouldn't go there intentionally if you didn't have to .

I'm guessing std cams do a similar kind of thing with the sloenoid switched on at idle .

The main issue is engine characteristics change if the solenoid switches at the wrong times , obviously too much valve overlap costs you part throttle off boost torque because the inlets close too late and the exhausts open too early . Once the gas speed is up a bit its better able to flow in the right directions .

I also look at RB25DETs as a lowish CR engine off boost and they seem to work best with conservative valve timeing for normal part throttle driving .

When my PWM table was referencing off throttle position there was no way to have the solenoid off up to 100 kpa/atmo pressure into the 2-3000 rev range (see table above) and with it on the overlap timing was to much to allow it to make best torque in these areas . It didn't really run camy or rough but it didn't feel sweet and at times a little breathless . Now its very smooth and has more torque meaning you open the throttle less just getting around . It made a big difference to the cold start and warm up characteristics meaning it drives a lot nicer initally now .

I am also starting to lean out some parts of the sub atmo pressure fuel map because I had it a tad rich in these areas looking for better part throttle performance .

I'll know later today how the consumption looks and theory suggests it should be better . Anything that improves fuel consumption (E70) and gains torque at the same time is all cake I reckon .

Cheers A .

Just as an update the consumption ended up ok but it drives better overall . I also changed the accel load table from MAP to TPS and I think thats going to work better overall too .

Do we have a Vipec/Link G4 plug in tuning thread here or do we want one ?

Cheers Adrian .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...