Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To the v Gurus out there I need some expert opinions mainly with injector and fuel rail upgrade. I have the following mods about to go on:

Motordyne TDX 2 exhaust

Motordyne MREV 2 bottom intake

5/16 spacer

Stillen z tube and k&n filter

Once completed ( 2 weeks hopefully) ill b taking it in for chip upgrade and tune, not sure what but there a garage here in Perth GTI Performance that has a finger on the pulse with V's and Z's.

So is it worth upgrading the fuel rails and injectors to optimise the mentioned mods? If so what?

All opinions are appreciated peeps

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426213-v35-extra-mod-opinion/
Share on other sites

If the existing rails and injectors are able to supply enough fuel, I can't see any benefits with changing them.

With the mods you mentioned, the factory injectors should be able to cope easily. If you want to tune for E85, you might need larger injectors though.

Cheers guys I pretty much thought the stock fuel system was up to it but don't we all look for that little bit more lol.

As for e85 fuel its of no use to me seeing as my V is an everyday car and its expensive enuf of premium 98 as is.

Is there any other NA mods I should consider guys? And has anyone heard bad reviews on out the HKS Circle grounding kit? I'm also going to utilize 1 seeing as I have an auto ( I know I know lol ) and I know it'll help with shifting and my sound system.

Jas

Scotty PM me the details for the transgo kit defiantly interested but might have to wait till next month wifey ain't to impressed with my expesive car hobby ATM lol.

As for Tokyo Motorsports I haven't heard good or bad reports only found them on here but ill be calling them Tuesday for a run down and ill post the findings here.

No worries, it's too late now anyway, I am fitting it to a car at the moment. :P

I will be placing another order Transgo soon, let me know if you want one and I will order a few extra kits. They take 2-4 weeks to get here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...