Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine *should* have all the go-fast bits needed for a low 13sec.. and I just got a HKS camgear put in and nice tune-up and its feeling quicker than ever. I find that after the camgear it spins up a fair bit quicker to redline so was worthwhile.

So will see what i can do in a week or two :rolleyes: Poor tyres will be thing holding me back i think.

Yours is a top effort though.. no gas, no slicks! :P

Thats a much nicer curve

Yeah, cheers :P Its quite funny, because I'm (obviously) really stoked and I was talking to someone recently who realised what my new power figure was and didn't see why I was quite so happy. The power figure is good, but getting up and going - and pulling through the midrange is meaty as anything. Feels like the 2.5turbo has been pulled and a big NA motor that revs to 7000rpm has been put in, 10-11psi is being reached by 2400rpm (lower than I expected - not sure what normal is). The area beneath the curve makes it feel to me like an all around much faster car, and just more pleasant to potter around in too :rolleyes:

I definately rate dyno tuning as a very important step - even without trying it at the strip... its obviously made the car more responsive etc, which has to be worth something in practical terms.

Guest Robo's

Dyno tuning is great, the only way to go. We played around with the boost settings on mine and tried to get the A/F ratios spot on. Also had a problem with spark too. Once you experience it, you get a picture of how the car performs and everything works together. Still mine is not 100% running correctly, but im not going to get this without a proper tuning tool.

What computer you got?

i have a 4 door with full 3" crpy cat in place bleed valve running 10.5 psi

soon to have fmic and safc and sedans are 70kgs lighter plus i am doing 100k service soon so i mayswell do the cam gear at the same time, hopefully should be around that mark havnt had it down the strip yet.

i only made 195.5 rwhp with boost and exh oh and filter so hoping to get some decent hp after i/c gear safc and 100k service.

Dyno tuning is great, the only way to go.  We played around with the boost settings on mine and tried to get the A/F ratios spot on.  Also had a problem with spark too.  Once you experience it, you get a picture of how the car performs and everything works together.  Still mine is not 100% running correctly, but im not going to get this without a proper tuning tool.  

What computer you got?

Yeah, it was great having an exhaust probe in there tracking things - and spotted some shady boost behaviour etc. It lays everything out on the table for you.

I'm just using an S-AFC2 :P

Guest Robo's

Yeah its great, as soon as we started to boost mine up, it started to splutter. So out come the plugs for some smaller gaps. Fired it back up and no misses. Even tried to boost it further, it read 14.7psi on the dyno print out, shot out 216rwkw, but it had more ups and downs than a rollercoaster. So pulled it back to 13.3psi and it was nice and smooth, made a little less up top for about 500rpm , but mid range was much better.

very nice, gotta be happy with that... glad you didn't resort to using NOS :wave:
But was your 12 with NOS?

Both your posts in this thread have been questioning the validity of nitrous.

You sound like the V8 Brigade 20 years ago when they bagged turbochargers and any form of forced induction and labelled it cheating :cheers:

Nitrous is a power adder, just like turbo or supercharging. Sure, it had a more limited application, but why does that make it cheating? All you're doing is squeezing more oxygen into the combustion cylinders, exactly what a turbocharger does. Who cares whether it's because a turbine is forcing it in, or a bottle is forcing it in? It's all just oxygen.

Get with the times. No-one cares whether you used nitrous or not. All that matters at the end of the day is that they're running 10s, and you're running 11s.

11's with gas ya goose :-D

I have developed a dickhead filter that gets rid of all the anti-nitrous, anti-thinking crap that goes on in peoples tiny minds so stuff like that is really water off a duck's back. Doesn't really phase me and i no longer take it personally.

Just to shut some people up though, I am racing with some of the other guys at WSID on the 30th of this month. The plan? No gas, standard turbo, 1.0bar, 12.6 ET @ approx 108mph.

Then you can all LICK MY SWEATY 11 SECOND BALLSACK!!!

:cheers:

Adrian

Maybe I am old fashioned (at 23 years young), but with NOS you can sit there all day running the same time, after x amount of runs you will run out, and need to refill the bottle... relational to consistency if you ask me.

I don't disagree with NOS, I just think it is should be treated separate all together... its non street legal, same as slicks etc...

The only time you can use it, is on the 1/4 mile strip.... (same with slicks) you are changing your car from being a street car to a non-legal street car - and in doing that you are putting yourself up against all the other non-legal street cars, which run much quicker cars.

I'm not big into the drag scene, so all this speaking is probably coming from inexperience (but it is all my opinion after all... we are all allowed those right?) I do want to get down to the strip and see what I can run (I believe it does take more skill than what it looks like), but I’m more interested in doing it on full street trim, so I know how quick my car is, all the time, not if I put slicks on, take out the spare tyre, etc...

I believe the race track is a better indication of how good a cars performance is (all round) NOS isn't much good on there.... I have mates in their LS1s which are quick.... in a straight line only...

The times 2rismo is running are better than I could do in my GTR (current state), and the times you will do merli will probably be better than I’ll ever get to... just opinion/thoughts.... I know I’m not alone in this thinking.

PS 12.6, no nos, standard turbo - that's impressive, must be some driving skills there

erm - ferni.. but legally just changing your stock airbox to a pod in some states may be "illegal" and "non street legal". Its a bit silly to classify it like that.

I find it hard at the drag strip to "feel" the car as much with the helmet on.. to know what its doing, to tell if its even really if its spinning the wheels. On the street you'd tell straight away and back off, but when you're relying a lot more on instinct and practice its like a very closed environment. So it does take good practice to get it right i think in the full dragstrip environment (helmet on, etc)

deano, i was reffering to the question from BOOSTD about who was first to run 12.x on std turbo. I have absolutely no idea. Get it?

And ferni, if I run my car without gas, with my spare in the boot etc but still have an externally venting BOV, is it in street legal trim? Very poor effort in classification, dude.

Adrian

PS 12.6, no nos, standard turbo - that's impressive, must be some driving skills there

Thanks but I'll let you know if I do it or not. I have run 12.6 @ the same mph as I run "no-gas" but as the WOT switch was playing up and i had it armed with the intention of using it, I wont claim it till i've done it - a problem that is rife on this forum.

Adrian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...