Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bit stumped so figured i'd post a thread

i've got a gauge that doesn't match up to a sensor/s, its over reading, i've wired resistors in series( if i wire in parallel temps go higher which is not what i need) on the sensor wire which does change the temp down as its over reading.

my problem is that when temps go hot to cold the temp display is kind of stuck and will only change with in 10-20 degree or so when in reality it should be reading much higher even though that cold base temps are spot on.

do i need some other components wired in other than resistors?

any clues ?

thanks

( if i wire in parallel temps go higher which is not what i need)

That's because wiring resistors in parallel reduces resistance.

How did you figure out which resistors to use so far?

I'm assuming single wire sensor?

Only thing i can think if at the moment is hook up a pot and some power to the gauge and see what resistance gets you from min to max.

What sensor are you using at the moment? If its pretty close find the data sheet and find the resistance curve, that should give you an idea of which pot to use.

Once you figure out an appropriate resistance range, you should be able to find another sensor with the right curve.

What gauge is it? Any chance you can get another sensor from the manufacturer?

am using a 'resistor wheel' from jay car which is just a knob on a dial that alternates to different resistance, also have hard wired resistors in to see if there was a difference .

using a 2 pin sensor although resistors are only connected to one wire obviously

the gauge is way off as the sensor that it came with is only a probe, not an actual bolt in water sensor so matching up a sensor to work with no changes to the circuit wont do it.

have tired a few sensors from ecu coolant to normal 2 pin aftermarket sensor and the temps are still getting stuck within a band

my wiring is pretty simple :

sensor + -> resistor in series -> wire to gauge

is this one for the guru's or cant it be done?

Edited by Dan_J

Thing to bear in mind thought is that the sensor is a thermistor and the output of it IS NOT linear. Google thermistor and you should get an understanding on how it works.

Adding resistors won't fix it , the correct sensor for the gauge will.

the gauge is way off as the sensor that it came with is only a probe, not an actual bolt in water sensor so matching up a sensor to work with no changes to the circuit wont do it.

So you have the sensor that it came with?

What brand gauge is it?

Thing to bear in mind thought is that the sensor is a thermistor and the output of it IS NOT linear. Google thermistor and you should get an understanding on how it works.

Depends on the application, i was under the impression that most auto water temp sensors were rtd's, which in that case should ideally be linear. I may be wrong though.

Dan_J say's it came with a probe which could be either.

so adding other components to calibrate it cant be done?

shall bin it then..

Not worth binning it yet, shouldn't be too hard to find the right sensor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...