Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'm wondering if anyone here has a remote starter on their vehicle as I'm having a little difficulty in trying to get mine to behave. I recently installed an alarm along with the XpressKit DB-ALL. On paper, it seemed the goods, just like the Clifford Avantguard G4 I once had in my Maxima - remote start, ability to take over with the engine still running and errand/pit-stop mode to allow the vehicle to run, remain armed and hop back in again to drive away.

The problem with the XpressKit solution is that the remote start doesn't allow me to then take over. According to the manual, I should be able to just enter the vehicle with the OEM remote, close the door, press the brake pedal and then it hands control over to the OEM system before disabling the remote start on the alarm. What it also says in the manual, though, is "Get In and Go connections required" but the damn manual doesn't say what those connections are and whether or not they're in addition to the connections showing in the wiring diagram earlier in the manual. I've connected everything as per that wiring diagram but I can't help thinking that DEI have intentionally left out that one bit of detail to annoy people like me who have taken the DIY path rather than through one of their authorised dealers. Several emails to Directed's tech support in Canada have gone unanswered beyond their response to my initial pre-sales enquiry when I was ready to purchase the unit.

Has anyone tried this brand of remote start bypass module before and if so, what are your experiences with it? All other functions seem normal and compatible with the exception of the door lock actuation via the BCM. It seems there may be a difference in the JDM Siemens VDO BCM as grounding the supposed unterminated lock/unlock pins on the BCM have no effect. I ended up having to make a relay board consisting of 3 relays allowing me to safely and harmoniously interface the alarm together with the BCM.

Edited by The Max
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429506-remote-starter-for-v36-query/
Share on other sites

I know that the CANbus plays up with ANY variety of alarm or any sort of introduced electronics on the V36. I am sure Chris will harp in soon and let you know the (presumably bad) news.

Just to add some detail to that last message, as it was the result of speaking to DEI's tech support in Canada, here's what the current (and seemingly final) situation is with the DEI install I performed on my V36:

1) Vehicle remote starts fine, Viper reports "Disarm" on the remote but does not alter the state of the door locks. In other words, if the doors are already locked, they remain so and likewise if they're already unlocked.

2) Viper then reports "Armed" on the remote but again, no change to the door locks.

3) Upon entering the vehicle as per the DB-ALL's instructions for the Get in and Go functionality, the moment I touch the foot brake, the remote start is deactivated and the vehicle stops running. I then have to manually start the vehicle. This is something I have to live with, it seems. After discussing the problem with DEI's technical phone support staff last night, they tried their best to analyse what was going on as their belief was that it should just work. We both agreed, on my suggestion, that this must be an issue of different programming between the USDM and JDM spec of these vehicles, highlighted by the fact the lock/unlock pins on the USDM vehicles' BCM don't seem to exist/function on the JDM BCM, as one example.

4) I found that the remote start was intermittent after having successfully used it for over a fortnight now. What I came to discover was that in my laziness and not setting up any Engine Checking Mode (left it off with cranking time set to the maximum 4.0 seconds), the brake switch was only actuating for about 2 seconds sometimes and therefore not in time for the DB-ALL to do its thing, leaving my vehicle with the ignition on but not started and all the while, the Viper thinking everything was running just fine. I pulled my finger (and Bitwriter) out, set up Engine Checking Mode to Tachometer, started the vehicle manually and programmed the tach speed while the vehicle was idling. We'll see if that's resolved the issue as I'm confident it should now hang onto the brake switch signal until it's at least cranking. Serves me right for being lazy!

So with all that said, I basically just have to live with a vehicle that needs to be restarted every time I hop in. In the grand scheme of things, though it means I'm doubling the use of my starter motor, at least the engine is warmed up and the cabin temp is where it should be by the time I hop into it. Have to take the good with the bad on this one, which is a shame but it's better than not having it at all. More importantly, at least the rest of the vehicle is unaffected and I have a clean bill of health according to my Consult III+ diagnostics unit.

Thank you most kindly. Let me know if they need any further information from me or even bits like the NATS module or BCM from my vehicle for analysis. I've also got my CAN bus logger if they need me to extract any data that could help them out.

I have to go to Dallas Tx for business. the makers of that unit will be there as well. it will be easier to talk face to face rather than bounce emails.

if I resolve your issue then you owe me $$ :) deal?

  • 7 months later...

I forgot to mention that this also means that their EIPS feature finally works too. I never liked the idea of the car still running without the key. I understand the merits but I prefer anti-carjacking in its roundabout kind of way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...