Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have new CP pistons with new piston rings but I do not know how much clearance there should be the piston rings. The engine develops 580bhp and I have heard that the clearance of piston rings must be greater when the effect is so great. If the clearance is small, it will destroy the cylinder. The engine is standard bore and compression.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/430044-piston-ring-clearances/
Share on other sites

There is a data sheet that came with the pistons that tells you the correct ring gapping based on application. It is a calculation based on cylinder bore diameter.

Yes it does need to be correct, as too much gap means excessive blow by/engine pressurisation. Not enough and you gall the cylinders and damage the pistons.

Usually it is a number in thousanths of an inch multiplied by the bore.

An RB26 has an 86mm bore which is 3.386 old speak.

Now the number of thou depends on your piston manufacturer, your application and experience. Mostly the recommendations are conservative. This is done because a too large a gap is a small, manageable problem. Too small a gap on the other hand can lead to the ends of the ring butting together and they stop working at all well when that happens.

Now if I remember correctly CP recommend bore * 0.0055 which gives you 18.6 thou. How conservative or otherwise this number is I dont know but I have seen larger numbers used. Conversely I have seen reference to this being too large.

Out of interest do you have the 1.0mm thick top rings in it?

I posted a detailed response to this thread which somehow got deleted...


The CP specs would be 18 thou top ring and 22-24 for the second. They say the second ring should be 4-6 thou larger than the top.

Oil rings must be 15 thou MINIMUM and they say DO NOT file these. Also, remember that you need to see both the green and red tabs on the oil expander, do not let the expander overlap. Also the oil rings sit in a groove on the expander, they DO NOT sit above/below it they sit ON it.


I did my own motor (86.5mm bore) at 18 and 22 and it has turned out awesome. Seeing as you are aiming for a little more power I would increase the second ring to 5 thou larger, so 18/23 for a street motor or up to 24 on the second ring if you want it to be a little looser. I would not be scared to go 19/26 on it.

At 18/22 my oil control in the SR is perfect. I went 18/25 in my brothers motor and that is a VERY free motor. I did that because it is an older mitsubishi motor which gets a lot of blow-by in factory guise and a few very experienced builders advised it would help in oil control, plus will make the motor a little happier in terms of power making.

Feel free to PM if you need help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
    • But again, the engineers said your cast aluminium would be fine based on the load that would be stretching that section. Same load stretching the bolts in a flex (not the twist), with a much smaller cross sectional area than the original part you've broken. It's why you'd need to be using higher strength bolts, but that's just making up for the strength you lose with less area...
    • I am truly amazed someone on this planet was able to cycle the pump using a scan tool. I've always ghetto cycled them on Nissan 90s shit boxes by slamming the brakes and pulling the handbrake to agitate the rear wheels enough to cause a speed difference
×
×
  • Create New...