Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at getting some swaybars for the 32gtst. it is becoming a track car, not a drifter, so i want to buy the right ones.

Selby looks good as i can order what i want.

However i dont know what to order.

Obviously blade adjustable, but what sizes front and rear for a good balance?

I know this subject has been covered (yes i searched a lot), but its basic info, for street use, and whiteline are different to selby.

I dont know if theres anything else relevant. Silvers neomax suspension, solid cradle bushes(thats another question, change? what to?), hicas gone, adjustable this and that.

Thanks.

post-89755-0-93179700-1376804838_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/430436-r32-gtst-swaybars/
Share on other sites

It's not hard. For really stiff result, put 27 adjustable on the front, 24 adjustable on the rear. You'll probably end up with the front one adjusted away from full stiff and the rear one at max stiffness. For less of a max stifness effort, 24 adjustable front and rear, with the rear probably set to the softer end and the front at the stiffer end. Although those recommendations will really be affected by the relative spring rates.

Realistically, unless you are a race team with budget, you cannot make this "correct" with just one setup anyway. Some will argue that the right way to set up suspension for the circuit is to use the lightest bars you can. The bars are just used for tuning the handling balance. The overall roll resistance is obtained by selecting stiff arse springs. But even then that's a hassle, because bumpy tracks and smooth tracks require different compromises between spring and ani-roll bars (note there's no such thing as a swaybar on a car that's not towing a trailer). And driver preference has a lot to do with it too. You may have two cars in the same team (so the same technical backup on both, with the same engineer) and the two drivers might end up with opposite spring/bar setups and still set similar times. Make them swap cars and they will both go slower.

Yes ill always be a noob racer, but im getting enjoyment from messing with my car. you know what i mean. ;)

So 27 f 24 r is a good all round starting point

Ok, basically in general front stiffer than rear

Right?

haha good point....the quality has never quite been the same since they started manufacturing offshore :(

from memory Roy had some trouble with whiteline bars on this 32

correct, he went to Cuscos.

Nope, and sometimes onshore they would measure from the wrong side of the bar bwahahaha

Yuh, my experience mirrors the above. Front and rear 24mm bars just fell onto my R32. Only hassle with the rear one was it would have helped me to get the car further off the ground before starting work! Granted, I had to put the chassis mount bushes for the front bar onto the wire wheel to remove enough material to make them fit into the D brackets, but I don't take that sort of obstacle seriously.

Sorry to hijack thread but also interested in getting some sway bars down the track..

No drifting.. :)

Question is, how can I identify what sway bars are already ON the car? They look stock to me and can't find any markings.

Edit: Maybe get some vernier calliper's and measure how thick they are?

Edited by Zrobe

You can just measure the thickness, but that might not tell the whole story. The stock front bars on R32s are hollow, hence they are much lighter than a similar sized solid and also somewhat less stiff than a similar sized solid. It is not possible to know exactly how thick the walls are on these hollow bars though, so it's not possible to calculate hoe stiff they are relative to a different sized aftermarket bar. If you have or can make a rig to test how stiff they are then you can compare them. Making such a rig is not super difficult, it's just a lot more work than most people are willing to put into it.

FWIW, my (originally) auto R32 (also a 1993) had a 16mm solid rear and a 22mm hollow front.

You can just measure the thickness, but that might not tell the whole story. The stock front bars on R32s are hollow, hence they are much lighter than a similar sized solid and also somewhat less stiff than a similar sized solid. It is not possible to know exactly how thick the walls are on these hollow bars though, so it's not possible to calculate hoe stiff they are relative to a different sized aftermarket bar. If you have or can make a rig to test how stiff they are then you can compare them. Making such a rig is not super difficult, it's just a lot more work than most people are willing to put into it.

FWIW, my (originally) auto R32 (also a 1993) had a 16mm solid rear and a 22mm hollow front.

Okay, no worries thanks heaps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...