Jump to content
SAU Community

Mugabetown - Whoretownin' At It's Worst.


Recommended Posts

Nismo fuel pumps are only 275lph or something silly. Sure they bolt in but thats about it. 450lph walbro pump will also cost ~150 bucks less IIRC. If the R33gtst fuel pump mount setup is similar to the R32gtst it's a peice of piss to modify it to fit, though getting to the tank may be harder due to 33's being less likely to combust in a rear end accident.

You could probably easily go smaller injectors (720cc?) and shave off a hundred bucks. Also make sure you buy side feed injectors to suite your fuel rail, with the right size holes etc.

Really need a FPR? Making 300kw's here without one, but maybe there's different stuff on the GTR fuel system?

I wouldn't double the tuning, maybe add only 50%, for flex. You're basically getting two tunes in there. That's assuming you have no issues however, which can quickly add up unfortunately. I mean, best case, just a 98 tune, 500 bucks maybe. Worst case, things to wrong, flex tune, 2000 bucks isn't out of the question, so be ware.

you're also just missing little stuff. Turbo gaskets, new studs, fittings for Ethanol sensor and the like can add up to a few hundred bucks

You'll need to figure out how you're going to get the car to the tuner aswell, Everything you need to do is easy enough to DIY at home (and... satisfying to do, i'd recommend it), but with bigger injectors the car will be undrivable unless you can get the tune adjusted for the injectors. Not sure how easy haltec is to modify

Not compatible? So Walbro over Bosch 040?

If you say so. You've done it recently.

yeah, the Walbro pump is E85 ready and as Pete said flows more than nismo pumps.

It can be fitted in tank too (just like mine)

Yeah, budget for at minimum 2k in tuning costs with eflex

R33 fuel tank is completely different to R32, just FYI.

Not sure how simple it is to mount a walbro/040 in tank in an R33

well as long is its not mounted to the tank floor it'd be easy enough :woot:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...