Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Although this topic has been covered millions of times i couldent really find an easy diagram to follow, the d1 installation guide has tiny pictures and i couldent see how it was routed..... and most of the other photots ive used as reference had the stock intake manifold, i have a FFP.. I also have my MAF directly infron of my throttle body.

so in the attached photo, can i :

Block of the GREEN

Split the red, into catch can

Vent the yellow into an intake pipe or stick a little filter onto it ?

OR

Green port into 1 side of catch can, Then

Split the red and have a t-piece, and put other side of catch can into the t-piece

Vent the yellow into an intake pipe or stick a little filter onto it

OR

Green and Yellow into catch cans, and leave the red as is ?

post-16967-0-68389800-1379919164_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432228-catch-can-routing-ffp-no-pcv/
Share on other sites

Two problems with a breather on a catch can -

1. They are illegal most places

2. You can end up with unpleasant fumes inside the car.

if you have a properly designed catch can then the baffles will ensure that oil is deposited in the can and you can safely vent it into your turbo intake

if you have a properly designed catch can then the baffles will ensure that oil is deposited in the can and you can safely vent it into your turbo intake

My understanding, the oil fumes entering the air intake will hinder the quality of the air (for combustion/efficiency), though fuel is made from refined oil so I can't be sure.

Probably not a noticeable loss anyway right?

My understanding, the oil fumes entering the air intake will hinder the quality of the air (for combustion/efficiency), though fuel is made from refined oil so I can't be sure.

Probably not a noticeable loss anyway right?

Doesn't seem to bother the big HP Japanese race cars who vent to the turbo intakes (or my RB30 for that matter )although they will have proper catch cans and sometimes an additional air/oil separator as well - but for the OP both of my points don't apply as for a track car legality is not an issue and he is not worried about fumes.

Never heard that one. The top of mine is higher than my throttle body (I have a FFP as well).

One other thing for motorsport there is often a requirement that catch cans have to be a minimum of 2 litres which a lot of ebay type ones are not.

Effectively, Yellow and Red are the same. So, leave the Red "U" tube alone, join the Yellow to one side of the "catch can". If this is a track car, you will need to direct the other side of the "catch can" somewhere other than atmosphere - this gives you an oil / air separator. On the track, they are going to be concerned about the potential to drop oil on the track - a can vented to atmosphere presents such potential. Block off Green - although it really should be connected to a PCV valve.

As you will have found in the many threads on the subject, loose pack the can with steel wool to give the oil vapours something to condense on. And because it is dealing with vapours, ie gasses, it doesn't matter a rotund rodent's derriere how high the can is relative to other engine components.

The required volume of the catch can depends on the engine capacity. Smaller engines require smaller minimum can sizes, obviously.

And the reason you need to separate the oil from the vapours is that any oil that gets into the intake air stream lowers the overall octane rating of the fuel/air mixture, leading to an increased risk of detonation on boost.

While you are in there, you will get far better benefit by moving the pod to a place where it can always get cold air. As it is, it is taking in hot air from the engine bay, the turbo is compressing it (making it even hotter), then the IC is trying to cool it back down again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...