Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Although this topic has been covered millions of times i couldent really find an easy diagram to follow, the d1 installation guide has tiny pictures and i couldent see how it was routed..... and most of the other photots ive used as reference had the stock intake manifold, i have a FFP.. I also have my MAF directly infron of my throttle body.

so in the attached photo, can i :

Block of the GREEN

Split the red, into catch can

Vent the yellow into an intake pipe or stick a little filter onto it ?

OR

Green port into 1 side of catch can, Then

Split the red and have a t-piece, and put other side of catch can into the t-piece

Vent the yellow into an intake pipe or stick a little filter onto it

OR

Green and Yellow into catch cans, and leave the red as is ?

post-16967-0-68389800-1379919164_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432228-catch-can-routing-ffp-no-pcv/
Share on other sites

Two problems with a breather on a catch can -

1. They are illegal most places

2. You can end up with unpleasant fumes inside the car.

if you have a properly designed catch can then the baffles will ensure that oil is deposited in the can and you can safely vent it into your turbo intake

if you have a properly designed catch can then the baffles will ensure that oil is deposited in the can and you can safely vent it into your turbo intake

My understanding, the oil fumes entering the air intake will hinder the quality of the air (for combustion/efficiency), though fuel is made from refined oil so I can't be sure.

Probably not a noticeable loss anyway right?

My understanding, the oil fumes entering the air intake will hinder the quality of the air (for combustion/efficiency), though fuel is made from refined oil so I can't be sure.

Probably not a noticeable loss anyway right?

Doesn't seem to bother the big HP Japanese race cars who vent to the turbo intakes (or my RB30 for that matter )although they will have proper catch cans and sometimes an additional air/oil separator as well - but for the OP both of my points don't apply as for a track car legality is not an issue and he is not worried about fumes.

Never heard that one. The top of mine is higher than my throttle body (I have a FFP as well).

One other thing for motorsport there is often a requirement that catch cans have to be a minimum of 2 litres which a lot of ebay type ones are not.

Effectively, Yellow and Red are the same. So, leave the Red "U" tube alone, join the Yellow to one side of the "catch can". If this is a track car, you will need to direct the other side of the "catch can" somewhere other than atmosphere - this gives you an oil / air separator. On the track, they are going to be concerned about the potential to drop oil on the track - a can vented to atmosphere presents such potential. Block off Green - although it really should be connected to a PCV valve.

As you will have found in the many threads on the subject, loose pack the can with steel wool to give the oil vapours something to condense on. And because it is dealing with vapours, ie gasses, it doesn't matter a rotund rodent's derriere how high the can is relative to other engine components.

The required volume of the catch can depends on the engine capacity. Smaller engines require smaller minimum can sizes, obviously.

And the reason you need to separate the oil from the vapours is that any oil that gets into the intake air stream lowers the overall octane rating of the fuel/air mixture, leading to an increased risk of detonation on boost.

While you are in there, you will get far better benefit by moving the pod to a place where it can always get cold air. As it is, it is taking in hot air from the engine bay, the turbo is compressing it (making it even hotter), then the IC is trying to cool it back down again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...