Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys trying to put a microtech lt12s in my 33 4door. I've got a plug and play set up but the power circuit was f**ked. So we've found a new power for the Ecu and plugged it in.

The hand controller said everything was ok and we set the tps to 0 then tryed to start it.

The starter motor was turning it over then stopping suddenly and ticking like the battery was flat. So with the jump leads hooked up to my room mates car we tryed again and it did the same thing, Then it stoped and jus ticked.

So thinking we've done damage we've out the old chipped Ecu in and it's still doing the same thing.

I'm pretty sure I've done the starter motor but I don't understand how. I'm also keen to jus see this Ecu work but so far the plug and play has given nothing but trouble

Can anyone help out please

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432912-rb25det-wont-turn-over/
Share on other sites

Kk now I've discovered I can turn the engine over by hand anti clock wise then when I go back the other way it gets to a point and stops like its locked up. But yet the car was running and driving this morning

Kk jus about to put the other starter motor in. But we jus discovered with the starter motor out I couldn't turn it clock wise either but I put a breaker bar on it and pushed hard as f**k then it turned over and seems fine now. Ill try another jump and another starter and fingers crossed it works

It gets hard to wind by hand because it has compression.

I told you in the first reply to check some voltages and this would have eliminated electrical fault with the start circuit. Hard to help people when they dont listen....

Mate compression isn't that tight. U can always turn it over by hand with effort. But when your pushing hard as f**k and it don't go that's worrying.

I was getting worried as my room mates n12 did the same thing jus before it blew the Ecu.

And was kinda hoping for some advice on microtech plug and play as well.

I was told it would jus go when it pluged in but now I've got no spark and my exhaust is loaded with fuel from tryin to crank it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...